期刊文献+

胆管支架加中药排石治疗难治性胆总管结石的对照研究 被引量:2

Traditional Chinese Medicine Combined Biliary Stents in the Treatment of Bile Duct Stones
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨胆管支架加口服排石中药对难治性胆总管结石治疗效果。方法收集符合难治性胆总管结石标准的患者80例,均行内镜下逆行胰胆管造影(ERCP)并置入胆管塑料支架,随后分为治疗组(胆管支架+中药)和对照组(胆管支架)。随访6个月后行第2次ERCP拔除支架并再次取石。比较两组间第2次结石大小和取石成功率。结果第1次ERCP时,两组之间在结石类型、平均结石大小等方面差异无统计学意义(P均>0.05)。随访6个月后,联合治疗组的结石大小明显小于对照组(P<0.05)。并且第2次ERCP取石成功率更高(97.5%vs 85.0%,P<0.05)。结论胆管支架加中药排石优于单用胆管支架对胆总管结石的治疗作用。 Objective To evaluate the effect of combination of oral Traditional Chinese medicine and biliary stents in the treatment of difficult bile duct stones.Methods Totally 80 cases of patients with common bile duct stones underwent biliary stent placement at the first ERCP.Then they were divided into treatment group and control group.They underwent a second ERCP and stone removal was attempted after 6 months follow up.Differences in stone size and success rate of stone extraction between groups after stenting were compared.Results At the first ERCP,no statistical significance between the two groups was found with respect to the stone type,the average stone size (P > 0.05).After 6 months follow up,the mean size of biliary stones was significantly lower in the treatment group than that in the control group (P < 0.05).The success rate of stone extraction was significantly higher in the treatment group than that in the control group (P < 0.05) at the second ERCP (97.5% vs 85.0%,P < 0.05).Conclusion The combination of traditional Chinese medicine and biliary stents in the treatment of difficult bile duct stones is safe and effective.
出处 《医学研究杂志》 2014年第11期56-58,共3页 Journal of Medical Research
基金 浙江省中医药科技计划项目(2012ZB103)
关键词 内镜下逆行胰胆管造影 胆石症 胆管支架 中药 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography Cholelithiasis Biliary stent Traditional Chinese medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Williams EJ,Green J,Beckingham I,et al.Guidelines on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS)[J].Gut,2008,57 (7):1004-1021.
  • 2Hong WD,Zhu QH,Huang QK.Endoscopic sphincterotomy plus endoprostheses in the treatment of large or multiple common bile duct stones[J].Dig Endosc,2011,23 (3):240-243.
  • 3Han J,Moon JH,Koo HC,et al.Effect of biliary stenting combined with ursodeoxycholic acid and terpene treatment on retained common bile duct stones in elderly patients:a multicenter study[J].Am J Gastroenterol,2009,104 (10):2418-2421.
  • 4Katsinelos P,Kountouras J,paroutoglou G,et al.Combination of endoprostheses and oral ursodeoxycholic acid or placebo in the treatment of difficult to extract common bile duct stones[J].Dig Liver Dis,2008,40(6):453-459.
  • 5Lee TH,Han JH,Kim HJ,et al.Is the addition of choleretic agents in multiple double-pigtail biliary stents effective for difficult common bile duct stones in elderly patients? A prospective,multicenter study[J].Gastrointest Endosc,2011,74(1):96-102.
  • 6Evans JA,Branch MS.The recalcitrant bile duct stone[J].Techniques in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy,2007,9(2):104-113.
  • 7胆石症中西医结合诊疗共识[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2011,31(8):1041-1043. 被引量:79
  • 8肖荣华.中西医结合治疗胆石症41例[J].中国中西医结合消化杂志,2001,9(6):370-370. 被引量:3
  • 9Cotton PB,Lehman G,Vennes J,et al.Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management:an attempt at consensus[J].Gastrointest Endosc,1991,37 (3):383-393.
  • 10洪捷敏,林琪,何祎,张佩翡.胆道塑料支架长期引流治疗高龄内镜下难取性胆总管结石的价值[J].中华消化内镜杂志,2009,26(4):201-203. 被引量:7

二级参考文献51

共引文献109

同被引文献20

引证文献2

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部