东亚STS的独特性——从傅大为与安德森之争谈起

The distinction of east asian STS The debate between Fu Daiwie and Warwick Anderson

台湾阳明大学从2007年开始出版的《东亚科学、技术与社会:一份国际期刊》(East Asian Science,Technology and Society:An International Journal,EASTS)杂志,目前已经成为国际STS研究的主要刊物之一。时任主编傅大为教授在创刊之初将"独特的"东亚STS的建设作为创刊目标,设定了东亚STS研究的特殊空间、对象和方法论;而以安德森(Warwick Anderson)为首的一批后殖民学者对傅大为提出的东亚STS独特性提出异议。本文梳理了傅大为与安德森的争论要点,通过对2007年至2012年EASTS的主题讨论进行统计分析,考察EASTS在哪些方面达到了傅大为教授所设想的东亚STS独特性?哪些方面没有?最后,对这些未能达到的目标进行理论分析。

National Yang - Ming University in Taiwan has published the East Asian Science, Technology and Society： An International Journal（EASTS） from 2007, the journal has become one of the most important journals of international STS research nowadays. Profes- sor Daiwie Fu, then the chief deitor of the journal was targeting the ＂distinctive＂ East Asian STS as the purpose of this magazine at the very inception of this publication, and setted up the special space, object and methodology of East Asian STS research; however, War- wick Anderson led a group of postcolonial scholars to raise an objection to the distinction of East Asian STS. This essay display the points of their debate, then by calculating and analyzing the special issues of EASTS from 2007 to 2012, investigate which points of the distinction of East Asian STS that Daiwie Fu has proposed are reached？ which are not？ Finally, this essay analyzs the reasons.