期刊文献+

R&D人员绩效特征及考评方法权变选择研究 被引量:9

R&D staff's performance characteristic and contingent selection of performance appraisal methods
原文传递
导出
摘要 R&D人员的绩效考评长期困扰着管理实践,对其分类考评逐渐成为共识,但这方面的实证研究还比较缺乏。通过问卷调查以及定量为主的分析表明:测量R&D人员绩效特征的变量结构是六因子二阶模型;根据其绩效特征的异同,可以将R&D人员分为两类;其中一类R&D人员的特征是绩效行为可评价性低而绩效结果可评价性中等,另一类的特征是绩效行为可评价性中等而绩效结果可评价性高;前一类R&D人员最认可结果考核与书面鉴定相平衡的考评方法,而结果考核为主行为考核为辅的考评方法却最适合后一类R&D人员。这些研究结论对于R&D人员的绩效考评具有指导价值。 R&D Staff' s performance appraisal has been long puzzling the management practice. It is gradually becoming consensus that classification of appraisal could be effective way; however, it is still lack for empirical study. In this paper, the result of questionnaire and quantitative analysis shows that: the variable of measuring R&D staff' s performance characteristic is six factors two orders model. R&D staff could be divided into two types according to the similarities and differences of performance characteristic, one represents low credibility of performance behavior appraisal and mediate credibility of performance outcome appraisal, while the other represents medi- ate credibility of performance behavior appraisal and high credibility of performance outcome appraisal. The former type of staffs ap- prove of the appraisal method which balanced the performance outcome appraisal and work plan report, while the method of consider outcome appraisal as primary, behavior appraisal as secondary suits for the latter type of staffs mostly. These results of this study pos- sess an important guiding value to R&D staff' s performance appraisal.
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第9期1352-1359,共8页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 教育部人文社科基金规划项目(10YJC630374) 国家自然科学基金项目资助(71402172)
关键词 研发人员 绩效特征 考评方法 匹配模式 R&D staff performance characteristic performance appraisal method matching model
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Chiesa V,Frattini F.Exploring the differences in performance measurement between research and development:evidence from a multiple case study[J].R&D Management,2007,(4):293-295.
  • 2许庆瑞,郑刚,徐操志,刘景江.研究与开发绩效评价在中国:实践与趋势[J].科研管理,2002,23(1):46-53. 被引量:55
  • 3张光进,张士菊.R&D人员绩效特征实证研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2014,35(5):164-171. 被引量:2
  • 4卢文岱.SPSSForWindows统计分析[M].北京:电子工业出版社,2002:45.
  • 5Lee C.Increasing performance appraisal effectiveness:matching task types,appraisal process and rater training[J].Academy of Management Review,1985,(10):322-331.
  • 6Guion R M,Gibson W M.Personnel selection and placement[J].Annual Review of Psychology,1988,(39):349-374.
  • 7Werner B M,Souder W E.Measuring R&D performance——state of the art[J].Research Technology Management,1997,(2):34-42.
  • 8赵曙明.绩效管理与评估[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2003.
  • 9张一弛.人力资源管理教程[M].北京:北京大学出版社,2002.38-48.
  • 10廖建桥,文鹏.知识员工定义、特征及分类研究述评[J].管理学报,2009,6(2):277-283. 被引量:58

二级参考文献137

共引文献345

同被引文献221

引证文献9

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部