期刊文献+

科学基金项目实施过程管理研究——基于质量问责视角 被引量:7

How to manage the NSFC ongoing projects:a quality accountability perspective
原文传递
导出
摘要 目前国家自然科学基金资助项目面临越来越大的绩效压力,随着资助绩效滞后性和资助年限延长,项目实施过程对于科学基金资助绩效的重要性日益凸显,为此亟需完善项目实施过程的管理。项目实施过程管理能够通过问责项目质量提高科学基金资助绩效。研究发现,当前科学基金过程管理的问责现状难以涵盖项目质量的全部要求,项目组应对现阶段过程管理问责时采取的认知策略也不利于科学基金提升资助绩效。以质量问责视角重新设计的项目实施过程管理机制,能够完善上述不足并解决现有问题,进而保障和提升科学基金资助绩效。 Nowadays, the National Natural Science Foundation of China(NSFC) is facing the situation of high performance pressure. As the lagging effect of the NSFC projects performance and the extending grant period of project, the significance of project implementa- tion for the funding performance is increasingly prominent. Hence, there is an urgent need for improving the ongoing projects manage- ment. To promote the funding performance, the management of NSFC ongoing projects can resort to the quality accountability of pro- jects. However, the current situation of the ongoing projects management can hardly cover all the demands of project quality in terms of accountability. And occasionally, the cognitive strategies which adopted by project groups to cope with the accountability are also disad- vantageous to the NSFC funding performance. So, this paper constructed a management mechanism of NSFC ongoing projects from the perspective of the quality accountability, in order to improve the current project management and enhance the NSFC funding perform- ance
出处 《科学学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第9期1369-1377,共9页 Studies in Science of Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(J1124002)
关键词 国家自然科学基金 质量问责 项目管理 项目实施过程管理 National Natural Science Foundation of China quality accountability project management management of ongoing projects
  • 相关文献

参考文献39

  • 1Barberis P.The new public management and a new accountability[J].Public Administration,1998,76(3):451-470.
  • 2国家财政部教科文司.自然科学基金资助与管理绩效国际评估回顾与展望[EB/OL].http://jkw.mof.gov.cn/zhengwuxinxi/jingyanjiaoliu/201304/t20130411_818312.html.
  • 3Fowler A.Performance management:the MBO of the90s[]].Personnel Management,1990,22(7):47-51.
  • 4Bovens M.The concept of public accountability[A].Ferlie E,Lynn L,Pollitt C.The Oxford Handbook of Public Management[C].Oxford University Press,2007.182-208.
  • 5Heinrich C J.Outcomes-based performance management in the public sector;implications for government accountability and effectiveness[J].Public Administration Review,2002,62(6):712-725.
  • 6Tetlock P E,Lerner J S.The social contingency model:Identifying empirical and normative boundary conditions on the error-and—bias portrait of human nature[A].Chaiken S E,Trope Y E.Dual-process Theories in Social Psychology[C].Guilford Press,1999.571-585.
  • 7Green M C,Visser P S,Tetlock P E.Coping with accountability cross—pressures:low-effort evasive tactics and high-effort quests for complex compromises[J].Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,2000,26(11):1380-1391.
  • 8张欣萍,白玉良,李丁.基金面上项目后期管理的探索与实践[J].中国科学基金,1994,8(2):142-145. 被引量:1
  • 9张弗天,靳达申,舒启茂.面上项目后期管理及集团管理的初步实践[J].中国科学基金,1994,8(2):134-137. 被引量:3
  • 10陈晓田,黄海军,李若筠.绩效评估——切实加强科学基金面上资助项目后期管理的有效途径[J].中国科学基金,2004,18(3):186-188. 被引量:18

二级参考文献13

共引文献80

同被引文献45

引证文献7

二级引证文献31

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部