期刊文献+

双向倒刺可吸收线连续缝合在腹腔镜肾部分切除术中应用临床分析 被引量:10

Clinical analysis of continuous kidney suture with bidirectional barbed absorbable line in retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨双向倒刺可吸收线连续缝合肾脏在后腹腔镜肾部分切除术中应用的安全性及可行性。方法 2012年2月至2014年3月,我院共实施220例后腹腔镜肾部分切除手术,实验组(n=122)采用双向倒刺可吸收线内外连续缝合肾脏,对照组(n=98)采用普通缝线缝合肾脏,两组术前按AJCC肾癌TNM肿瘤分期均为T1N0M0。结果 220例后腹腔镜肾部分切除手术全部顺利完成,无一例中转开放,未出现严重术中并发症。实验组和对照组平均手术时间为(79.8±11.8)和(81.2±11.3)min(P=0.40)、平均缝合时间为(8.5±2.0)和(12.8±2.8)min(P〈0.01)、平均热缺血时间为(18.3±4.0)和(23.1±5.2)min(P〈0.01)。患者住院时间分别为(6.3±2.3)和(8.0±1.4)d(P〈0.01)。术后3个月实验组和对照组患肾GFR分别为(35.5±12.6)和(28.7±15.5)ml/min(P〈0.01)。实验组术后血尿4例,对照组5例(P=0.737),实验组无尿漏发生,对照组肾缺损部位尿漏2例(P=0.071),术后随访6-30个月,平均18.8个月,两组均无结石形成,均无肿瘤局部复发和远处转移。结论双向倒刺可吸收线连续缝合在后腹腔镜肾部分切除术中应用能够明显缩短缝合时间和热缺血时间,且不引起结石形成,具有很好的安全性和可行性,值得临床广泛推广。 Objective To investigate the safety and feasibility of continuous kidney suture with bidirectional barbed absorbable suture line in retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy. MethodsBetween Feb 2012 and Mar 2014,220 cases of retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy were performed in our hospital.All patients were divided into two groups:self-retaining barbed suture(SRBS)group(n=122)and non-SRBS group(n=98).All cases were in stage T1N0M0 according to AJCC. Results All 220 cases of retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy were successfully performed,without conversion to open surgery or severe intraoperative complications.The respective mean operation time were(79.8±11.8)and(81.2±11.3)min(P=0.40)in test group and control group,the mean suture time were(8.5±2.0)and(12.8±2.8)min(P〈0.01),the mean warm ischemia time were(18.3±4.0)and(23.1±5.2)min(P〈0.01)and mean hospital duration were(6.3±2.3)and(8.0±1.4)day(P〈0.01).The respective mean GFR were(35.5±12.6)and(28.7±15.5)ml/min(P〈0.01)after a 3-month follow-up.There were 4cases of blood urine in test group and 5cases(P=0.737)in control group.2cases of urine leakage were observed in control group and none(P=0.071)in test group.Postoperative follow-up were 6-30 month,with an average of 18.8 month.No case of stone formation was observed in both groups. Conclusions The continuous kidney suture with bidirectional barbed absorbable suture line in retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy could shorten suture time,warm ischemia time,hospital stay and avoid stone formation.It is safe and feasible and worth popularizing widely.
出处 《现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志》 2014年第5期264-267,共4页 Journal of Contemporary Urologic and Reproductive Oncology
关键词 双向倒刺可吸收线 后腹腔镜 肾部分切除术 Bidirectional barbed absorbable line Retroperitoneoscopy Partial nephrectomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1江山,梁朝朝,施浩强,张贤生.经腹运用肝脏游离技术治疗肾癌合并肝后下腔静脉瘤栓[J].现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志,2013,5(5):262-265. 被引量:3
  • 2(;ill IS, Matin SF, Desai MM, et al. Comparative analysis of laparoseopic versus open partial nephrectomy for renal tumors in 200 patients[J]. J Urol,2003,170(1):64- 68.
  • 3朱刚,张亚群,张耀光,金滨,魏东,万奔,王建业.单孔腹腔镜根治性肾切除术治疗肾细胞癌[J].现代泌尿生殖肿瘤杂志,2012,4(4):200-203. 被引量:4
  • 4Allaf ME, Bhayani S, Rogers BC, et al. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: evaluation of long term oncological outcome [J]. J Urol,2004,172(3) :871-873.
  • 5Seifman BD, Hollenbeck BK, Wolf JS. Laparoscopic neph- ron sparing surgery for a renal mass: 1-year minimum fol- low up[J]. J Endourol,2004,18(8) :783-786.
  • 6Gong EM, Orvieto MA, Zorn KC, et al. Comparison of lap- aroscopic and open partial nephrectomy in clinical Tla renal tumors[J]. J Endourol,2008,22(5) : 953-957.
  • 7Ramani AP, Desai MM, Steinberg AP, et al. Complications of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in 200 cases[J]. J Urol, 2005,173(1) :42-47.
  • 8Lane BR, Novick AC, Babineau D, et al. Comparison of lap aroscopic and open partial nephrectomy for tumor in a solita- ry kidney[J]. J Urol,2008,179(3):847-852.
  • 9Kane C J, Mallin K, Ritchey J, et al. Renal cell cancer stage migration: analysis of the national cancer data base[J]. Cancer,2008,113(1) :78-83.
  • 10Collins S, McKiernan J, Landman J. Up date on the epide- miology and biology of renal cortical neoplasms[J]. J Endou- rol, 2006,20 (12) : 975-985.

二级参考文献12

  • 1熊奇如,耿小平.经腹经心包全肝血流阻断肝切除七例报告[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(21):1510-1511. 被引量:8
  • 2马建辉,何志嵩,戴玉田,等.肾脏肿瘤诊断治疗指南[M]//那彦群,孙则禹,叶章群,等.中国泌尿外科疾病诊断治疗指南(2009版).北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:4-15.
  • 3Liungberg B, Hanbury DC, Kuczyk MA, et al. Renal cell carcinoma guideline[J]. Eur Urol,2007,51: 1502-1510.
  • 4Fornara P, Doehn C, Friedrich HJ, et al. Nonrandomizcd comparison of open flank versus laparoscopic nephrectomy in249 patients with benign renal disease[J]. Eur Urol, 2001,40 (1) :24-31.
  • 5Raman JD, Bagrodia A, Cadeddu JA, et al. Single-incision, umbilical laparoscopic versus conventional laparoscopic ne- pbrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes and short-term measures of eonvalescence[J]. Eur Urol, 2009,55 (5):1198- 1206.
  • 6Autorino R, Cadeddu JA, Desai MM, et al. Laparoendoscopic single-site and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery in urology: a critical analysis of the literature[J]. Eur Urol, 2011,59(1) :26-45.
  • 7Raman JD, Cadeddu JA, Rao P, et al. Single-incision laparo- scopic surgery: initial urological experience and comparison with natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery[J]. BJU Int,2008,101(12) :1493- 1496.
  • 8Stolzenburg JU, Kallidonis P, Hellawell G, et al. Technique of laparoscopic-endoscopic single-site surgery radical nephrec- tomy[J]. Eur Urol,2009,56(4):644 -650.
  • 9肖序仁,王茂强,杨勇,高江平,蔡伟,宋勇,韩宇,洪宝发,董隽,徐阿祥,许勇.经皮球囊导管阻断技术在下腔静脉瘤栓切除术中的应用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2009,30(5):313-316. 被引量:6
  • 10JI Zhi-gang XUE Chong LI Han-zhong WANG Hui-jun XIE Yi LIU Guan-hua.Piggyback liver transplant techniques in the surgical management of urological tumors with inferior vena cava tumor thrombus[J].Chinese Medical Journal,2009(18):2155-2158. 被引量:4

共引文献5

同被引文献72

引证文献10

二级引证文献35

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部