期刊文献+

血清VEGF,SCC-Ag和CYFRA21-1对中晚期肺鳞癌化疗疗效评估的价值 被引量:5

Value of Serum VEGF,SCC-Ag and CYFRA2 1-1 for Predicting Eesponse to Chemotherapy in Advanced Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨联合检测中晚期肺鳞癌患者血清血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)、鳞状细胞癌抗原(SCC-Ag)和细胞角蛋白19片段(CYFRA21-1)在化疗疗效评估中的价值。方法对2011年1月-2013年6月间入院收治的60例肺鳞癌患者,吉西他滨联合顺铂或卡铂方案予以化疗,采用 ELISA和免疫放射分析法测定患者化疗前、化疗1周期后血清 VEGF, SCC-Ag和CYFRA21-1的水平;并在化疗2周期后参照实体疗效评价标准(RECIST)进行疗效评价。结果有效组血清VEGF和CYFRA21-1水平分别为413±114 pg/ml和14.7±9.6 ng/ml,化疗1周期后血清VEGF和CYFRA21-1水平分别为272±131 pg/ml和10.8±7.1 ng/ml,化疗后明显下降(P值均<0.01)。进展组血清VEGF和CYFRA21-1水平分别为472±207 pg/ml和18.9±17.6 ng/ml;化疗1周期后血清VEGF和CYFRA21-1水平分别为537±219 pg/ml和21.5±20.2 ng/ml,化疗后明显上升(P值均<0.01)。稳定组血清 VEGF和CYFRA21-1水平分别为419±246 pg/ml和17.0±12.9 ng/ml;化疗1周期后血清 VEGF和CYFRA21-1水平分别为421±252 pg/ml和16.8±11.7ng/ml,治疗前后无明显变化(P值均>0.05)。血清 SCC-Ag水平在各组治疗前后差异无统计学意义(P 值均>0.05)。多重回归分析显示,血清VEGF,CYFRA21-1水平变化与肺鳞癌化疗疗效变化相关(t=5.86,P<0.001;t=2.26,P=0.027),而血清 SCC-Ag水平与肺鳞癌的化疗效果变化无明显相关(t=1.52,P=0.133)。结论血清 VEGF和CYFRA21-1表达水平变化与肺鳞癌化疗疗效相关,能够提前了解化疗效果,联合检测血清 VEGF和CYFRA21-1对评估中晚期肺鳞癌化疗疗效有一定的参考价值。 Objective To investigate the combined detection of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF),squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag)and cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1)value in assessing the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the lung.Methods 60 cases of lung squamous cell carcinoma patients in January 2011 between June 2013 to be admitted to hospital were treated with gemcitabine plus cisplatin or carboplatin chemotherapy.Detected the levels of serum VEGF,SCC-Ag and CYFRA21-1 expression in 60 cases before and after 1 cycle of chemotherapy in patients using ELISA and immunoradiometric assay,and evaluated the efficacy evaluation with reference to RECIST criteria after 2 cycle of chemotherapy.Results Effective group serum VEGF and CYFRA21-1 levels were 413± 114 pg/ml and 14.7±9.6 ng/ml;serum VEGF and CYFRA21-1 levels after one cycle of chemotherapy were 272±131 pg/ml and 10.8±7.1 ng/ml,which decreased after chemotherapy (P〈0.01).Progress group serum VEGF and CYFRA21-1 levels were 472±207 pg/ml and 18.9±17.6 ng/ml;serum VEGF and CYFRA21-1 levels after one cycle of chemotherapy were 537±219 pg/ml and 21.5±20.2 ng/ml,which increased after chemotherapy (P〈0.01).Stable group serum VEGF CYFRA21-1 levels and were 419±246 pg/ml and 17.0±12.9 ng/ml;serum VEGF and CYFRA21-1 levels after one cycle of chemotherapy were 421±252 pg/ml and 16.8±11.7 ng/ml,which had no changes before and after treatment (P〉0.05). Serum SCC-Ag levels before and after each treatment group difference was not statistically significant (P〉0.05).Multiple regression analysis showed that serum VEGF,CYFRA2 1-1 levels and the efficacy of lung squamous were related changed (t=5.86,P〈0.001;t=2.26,P=0.027),and there was no significant correlation between SCC-Ag levels changes and the effect of chemotherapy (t=1.52,P=0.133).Conclusion Serum VEGF and CYFRA21-1 expression level changes associat-ed with squamous cell carcinoma of the lung chemotherapy effect,which can advance understanding of the effect of chemo-therapy,combined with advanced squamous cell carcinoma detection of serum VEGF and chemotherapy assessment CY-FRA2 1-1 has a certain reference value.
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2014年第5期123-126,共4页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
关键词 肺癌 血清 肿瘤指标 化疗 lung cancer serum tumor marker chemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Zarogoulidis K,Zarogoulidis P,Darwiche K,et al. Tr- eatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)[J].Journal of Thoracic Disease, 2013,5 ( Suppl 4 ) : S389-S396.
  • 2Reck M, Heigener DF,Mok T,et al. Management of non-small-cell lung cancer., recent developments[J].Lancet, 2013,382 ( 9893 ) : 709-719.
  • 3Cagle PT ,Allen TC,Olsen RJ. Lung cancer biomark ers: present status and future developments [J]. Ar- chives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 2013, 137(9) :1191-1198.
  • 4Rosell R,Bivona TG,Karachaliou N. Genetics and bi- omarkers in personalisation of lung cancer treatment [J]. Lancet, 2013,382 (9893) : 720-731.
  • 5Siegel R, Naishadham D, J emal A. Cancer statistics, 2013 [J]. CA-A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2013,63 (1):11-30.
  • 6Diederich S. Imaging beyond RECIST:CT and MRI in molecular therapies[J]. Cancer Imaging, 2012,12 ( 2 ) : 347-350.
  • 7Nishino M,Jagannathan JP, Krajewski KM,et al. Pe- rsonalized tumor response assessment in the era of molecular medicine., cancer-specific and therapy-spe- cific response criteria to complement pitfalls of RE- CIST[J]. AJR. American Journal of Roentgenology, 2012,198(4) : 737-745.
  • 8Coche E. Recist and beyond[J]. JBR BTR,2013,96 (3):167-171.
  • 9Wahl RL,Jacene H,Kasamon Y,et al. From RECIST to PERCIST: evolving considerations for PET re- sponse criteria in solid tumors[J]. Journal of Nuclear Medicine,2009,50(Suppl 1) : 122S-150S.
  • 10Hur J,Lee HJ,Nam JE,et al. Additional diagnostic value of tumor markers in cytological fluid for diag- nosis of non-small-cell lung cancer[J]. BMC cancer 2012 (12) : 392.

二级参考文献27

共引文献37

同被引文献37

  • 1黄镜,蔡锐刚,孟平均,张明娟,崔成旭,杨林,储大同,孙燕,王金万.紫杉醇联合顺铂治疗晚期食管鳞癌[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2004,26(12):753-755. 被引量:96
  • 2Yamamoto K, Oka M, Hayashi H ,et al. CYFRA 21-1 is a useful marker for esophageal squamous cell carci- noma[J]. Cancer, 1997,79(9) : 1647-1655.
  • 3Pujol JL, Grenier J, Daures JP, et al. Serum fragment of cytokeratin subunit 19 measured by CYFRA 21-1 immunoradiometric assay as a marker of lung cancer [J3. Cancer Res,1993,53(I) :61-66.
  • 4Yi Y, Li BS, Sun HF, et al. Predictors of sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy of esophageal squamous cell carci- nomaS-J]. Tumour Biol, 2010,31 (4) : 333-340.
  • 5Zhang HQ, Wang RB, Yan HJ, et al. Prognostic sig- nificance of CYFRA21-1 ,CEA and hemoglobin in pa- tients with esophageal squamous cancer undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prey,2012,13(1) :199-203.
  • 6Shen J,Song G, An M, et al. The use of hollow mesoporous silica nanospheres to encapsulate bortezomib and improve efficacy for non-small cell lung cancer therapy [ J ]. Biomaterials, 2014,35 ( 1 ) : 316-326.
  • 7Fiala O,Pesek M,Finek J,et al. Predictive role of CEA and CYFRA 21-1 in patients with advanced-stage NSCLC treated with erlotinib[J]. Anticancer Res,2014, 34(6) :3205-3210.
  • 8Neff S,Yoshida J,Ishii G,et al. Prognostic impact of microscopic vessel invasion and visceral pleural invasion in non-small cell lung cancer: a retrospective analysis of 2657 patients [J]. Ann Surg, 2014,260(2) :383-388.
  • 9Li J, Chen P, Mao CM, et al. Evaluation of diagnostic value of four tumor markers in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid of peripheral lung eancerEJ]. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol, 2014,10(2) : 141-148.
  • 10Tomita M, Ayabe T, Chosa E, et al. Postoperative serum CEA level is a more significant prognostic factor than post/preoperative serum CEA ratio in non-small cell cancer patients[J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prey, 2015,16 ( 17 ) : 7809-7812.

引证文献5

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部