期刊文献+

ISO15189:2012与室间质量评价 被引量:3

ISO 1 5 1 8 9:2 0 1 2 and External Quality Assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 室间质量评价作为一种有效的质量控制工具,可以帮助临床实验室发现检验过程中存在的质量问题,促使实验室采取相应的措施提高检测质量。传统的室间质量评价样品具有一定的基质效应,需要对方法进行分组才能确定靶值。理想的室间质量评价使用具有互换性的样品,具有与患者样品一样的性质,在不同测量程序上的结果具有一致性,通过参考系统建立靶值,可以用来评估与参考系统或指定的比对方法的正确度。在数据统计分析时,可以使用能更真实地反映实验室之间检测结果变异性的稳健统计方法,并采用合适的标准对结果进行评价。如果出现不合格结果,需进行彻底调查,系统地评估检测过程中的每一个方面,找出问题的根源,并采取适当的纠正措施。如果项目没有开展正式的室间质量评价计划,应使用替代性评估程序对这些试验进行性能评估。 External quality assessment (EQA)as an effective tool for quality control can help clinical laboratories to discover quality problems during testing process and prompt clinical laboratories to improve their testing quality.Samples used for traditional EQA frequently have matrix effects which assign the target value by grouping.Ideal samples for EQA are com-mutable which have the same numeric relationship between different measurement procedures as that expected for patients’ samples.And they can assess accuracy against a reference measurement procedure or a designated comparison method.When analyzing,robust statistical method can be used to reflect the variability of testing results between laboratories more truly. And the evaluation standards should be desirable.If unsatisfactory results appear,we should investigate every aspect of tes-ting process,find the root cause,and take corrective action.On condition that no official EQA scheme is launched for some analytes,it is necessary for us to evaluate the performance of analytes by alternative evaluation procedures.
出处 《现代检验医学杂志》 CAS 2014年第5期161-163,共3页 Journal of Modern Laboratory Medicine
关键词 ISO 15189 室间质量评价 互换性 稳健统计方法 external quality assessment commutability robust statistical method
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献23

  • 1童清,王清涛.临床化学定量测定室间质量评价的有关问题[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(2):131-133. 被引量:36
  • 2陈文祥,申子瑜,郭健,杨振华.临床检验量值溯源中的重要术语与概念及有关问题[J].中华检验医学杂志,2005,28(2):142-146. 被引量:35
  • 3周琦,李少男,李小鹏,王薇,王治国.临床检验室间质量评价数据中离群值的研究[J].中华检验医学杂志,2007,30(2):214-216. 被引量:10
  • 4Sciacovelli L, Secchiero S, Zardo L, et al. External Quality Assessment Schemes: need for recognised requirements. Clin Chim Acta, 2001,309 : 183-199.
  • 5Miller WG. Specimen materials, target values and commutability for external assessment (proficiency testing) schemes. Clin Chim Acta, 2003, 327 : 25-37.
  • 6Shahangian S. Proficiency testing in laboratory medicine uses and limitations. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 1998, 122 : 15-30.
  • 7Laessig RH, Ehmeyer SS. Use of computer modeling to predict the magnitude of intralaboratory error tolerated by proposed CDC interlabomtory proficiency testing performance criteria. Clin Chem, 1988, 34 : 1849-1853.
  • 8Ricos C, Baadenhuijsen H, Libber C J, et al. External quality assessment:currently used criteria for evaluation performance in european countries, and criteria for future harmonization. Clin Chem Clin Biochem, 1996, 34: 159-165.
  • 9Ehmeyer SS, Laessig RH. Interlaboratory proficiency-testing programs: a computer model to assess their capability to correctly characterize intralaboratory performance. Clin Chem, 1987, 33 : 784-787.
  • 10国家质量技术监督局.GB/T15483.1-1999,利用实验室间比对的能力验证PT.第1部分:能力验证计划的建立和运作.北京:中国标准出版社,1999.

共引文献40

同被引文献14

引证文献3

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部