期刊文献+

从隐喻和转喻的视角看待人体词“nose”认知语义网络及启示 被引量:1

The Semantic Web of “Nose”and its Enlightenment from the Perspective of Metaphor and Metonymy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 一词多义是语言中非常重要的语言现象,具有重要的研究价值。对典型人体词"nose"的一词多义的认知研究,不仅有利于揭示词义拓展的基本规律、词义拓展的认知机制,而且对于揭示认知主体的思维模式和认知特点也具有重要的意义。从认知的角度对作为修辞手段的隐喻和转喻进行了新的探索,指出二者不仅是重要的思维模式和认知手段,也是一词多义的认知机制。通过一词多义的词义网络,揭示出词义的拓展不是任意的,隐喻和转喻在词义拓展过程中是相互交织的,进一步证实语言不是自治的、封闭的系统,从而在一定程度上驳斥了索绪尔的语言"任意说"的观点。 Polysemy as a very important language phenomenon has important value of research.“Nose”as an important organ of the head has more cognitive advantages concerning its location and feature.In addition,human body terms are the cognitive meta-concepts and the cognitive starting point for the world, so the study of polysemy of the typical human body term is not only beneficial to reveal the basic laws and the cognitive mechanism of semantic extension,but also beneficial to reveal the thinking modes and cog-nitive characteristics of the cognitive subjects.Moreover,metaphor and metonymy have long been consid-ered as two rhetorical means,and this paper carried on the new exploration of metaphor and metonymy from the perspective of cognition,and pointed out that metaphor and metonymy are not only important thinking modes and cognitive means,but also the cognitive mechanism of polysemy.Based on the seman-tic web of polysemy,this paper reveals that the semantic extension is not arbitrary,and metaphor and metonymy are interweaved in the process of semantic extension,which further confirms that language is not an autonomous,closed system,and in this way dismisses to a certain degree the Saussure’s language“arbitrary”point of view.
作者 刘志成
出处 《昆明冶金高等专科学校学报》 CAS 2014年第6期83-87,共5页 Journal of Kunming Metallurgy College
基金 浙江省哲社规划课题:中国四大古典名著中人体词的认知与翻译研究(12JCWW23YB) 云南大学人文社会科学青年研究基金:从隐喻和转喻的视角看待英语头部人体词一词多义认知语义网络及启示(14YNUHSS001)阶段性成果
关键词 一词多义 隐喻 转喻 认知 polysemy metaphor metonymy cognition
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1KATAJ,FODORJ.TheStructureofaSemanticTheory[J].Language,1963,(39).
  • 2LAKOFFG,JOHNSONM.MetaphorsWeLiveby[M].Chicago:UniversityofChicagoPress,1980.
  • 3LYONSJ.Semantics[M].2vols.Cambridge:Cam-bridgeUniversityPress,1977.
  • 4MARINA,RAKOVA.TheExtentoftheLiteral-Meta-phor,PolysemyandTheoriesofConcept[M].PalgraveMacmillan/Beijing:PeikingUniversityPress,2004.
  • 5RAVIN Y,LEACOCK C.Polysemy:TheoreticalandComputationalApproaches[M].Oxford:OxfordUniver-sityPress,2000.
  • 6SWEETSER E.From EtymologytoPragmatics:Meta-phoricalandCulturalAspectsofSemanticStructure[M].Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress,1990.
  • 7ULLMANNS,SEMANTICS.AnIntroductiontotheSci-enceofMeaning[M].Oxford:Blackwell,PublishersLtd.,1962.
  • 8UNGERERF,SCHMIDHJ.AnIntroductiontoCogni-tiveLinguistics(2ndedition)[M].Harlow:PearsonEd-ucationLimited,2006.
  • 9陈新仁.试探“经济原则”在言语交际中的运行[J].外语学刊,1994(1):8-12. 被引量:76
  • 10傅德根.威廉斯与文化领导权[J].外国文学评论,2000(4):127-134. 被引量:11

二级参考文献12

  • 1陈新仁.试探“经济原则”在言语交际中的运行[J].外语学刊,1994(1):8-12. 被引量:76
  • 2黄华新,徐慈华.隐喻表达与经济性原则[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2006,36(3):22-28. 被引量:37
  • 3康德.康德书信百封[M].李秋零译.上海:上海人民出版社,1992:244.
  • 4John R Taylor. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory[ M]. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2001:23.
  • 5AdeleEGoldberg.构式:论元结构的构式语法研究[M].吴海波,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007:150.
  • 6雷蒙·威廉斯.《马克思主义与文学》[M].人民出版社,1977年版.第112页.
  • 7《葛兰西文选(1916-1935)》,中央编译局国际共运史研究所编译,人民出版社,1992年.第418、420、421、439页.
  • 8威廉斯.《关键词》,格拉斯哥,方特纳出版社.1983年,第145页.
  • 9威廉斯.《唯物主义与文化问题》,伦敦,维索出版社.1980年,第39页.
  • 10威廉斯.《漫长的革命》,伦敦,查托和温杜斯出版公司,1961年,第50、51页.

共引文献147

同被引文献7

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部