期刊文献+

论教师发展的本质与价值取向 被引量:32

On the Essence and Value Orientations of Teacher Development
原文传递
导出
摘要 我国教师教育的根本问题是仅把教师视为社会控制的对象,否定教师认识的独特性,由此导致教师教育的"传递主义"、"技能主义"和"技术主义"倾向。理解教师发展的本质与价值取向是使我国教师教育走出误区的关键。基于"技术兴趣"的教师发展观把教师视为"教学技师",由此导致形形色色的教师技能训练模式。基于"实践兴趣"的教师发展观把教师视为"反思性实践者",教师由此成为一种专业,"专业发展"成为教师教育的目标。基于"解放兴趣"的教师发展观把教师视为"知识分子",教师由此进入"后专业"阶段,"自由发展"成为教师教育的根本追求。教师的专业发展与自由发展相互依存、相互影响、相互融合。我国教师教育重建的基本方向是实现教师专业发展与自由发展的一体化。 Treating teachers as the object of social control and denying the uniqueness of teachers" knowledge are the fundamental problems of China's teacher education. These result in the orientations of knowledge-transmission, skill-training, and teehnicism. It is crucial for China's teacher education to step out of erroneous zone that we understand the essence and value orientations of teacher development. The "technical-interest" oriented view of teacher development treats teachers as "teaching technicians", which raises various training models of teacher's skills. The "practical-interest" oriented view of teacher development treats teachers as "reflective practitioners". So, teacher becomes a profession, and professional development becomes the aim of teacher education. The "emancipatory-interest" oriented view of teacher development treats teachers as "intellectuals". So, teachers go into the stage of "post-profession", and liberal development becomes the fundamental pursuit of teacher education. Teachers" professional development and liberal development are interdependent, reciprocally influential, and mutually integrated. The basic direction of reconstructing China's teacher education is to realize the integrity of professional development and liberal development of teachers.
作者 张华
出处 《教育发展研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第22期16-24,共9页 Research in Educational Development
基金 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大课题"中国21世纪新课程改革研究"(11JJD880036)的部分成果
关键词 教师发展 专业发展 自由发展 技术兴趣 实践兴趣 解放兴趣 teacher development, professional development, liberal development, technical interest, practical interest, emancipatoryinterest
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1王策三.教学论稿[M].北京:人民教育出版社,1985..
  • 2王策三.“新课程理念”“概念重建运动”与学习凯洛夫教育学[J].课程.教材.教法,2008,28(7):3-21. 被引量:82
  • 3Schwartz, H. The Changing Nature of Teacher Education [A]. In John Sikula (ed.). Handbook of Research on Teacher Education (2"d ed.)[C] New York: Macmillan, 1996.3-13.
  • 4Pinar, W. "Whole, bright, deep with understanding": Issues in Qualitative Research and Autobiographical Method[A]. In W. Pinar (ed.) Contemporary Curriculum Discourses[C]. Scottsdale, AZ: Gorsuch, Scaribrick, 1988.134-154.
  • 5Tyler, R. Basic Principles of Curriculum and Instruction[M]. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.1949.
  • 6陈桂生.重评凯洛夫《教育学》[J].河北师范大学学报(教育科学版),1998(1):42-48. 被引量:10
  • 7Grundy, S. Curriculum: Product or Praxis[M]. London: The Falmer Press, 1987.13,16,180-183,189,188.
  • 8Schwab, J. The Practical: A Language for Curriculum[J]. The School Review, Vol. 78. No. 1, 1969.1-23.
  • 9Schwab, J. The Practical 3: Translation into Curriculum[J]. The School Review, Vol. 81, No. 4, 1973.501-522.
  • 10Stenhouse, L. An Introduction to Curriculum Research and Development[M]. London: Heinemann, 1975.142.

二级参考文献48

共引文献510

同被引文献261

引证文献32

二级引证文献178

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部