评罗尔斯对全球分配正义原则的拒斥

On the Rejection of Global Distributive Justice of Rawls

约翰·罗尔斯对全球分配正义原则持一种否定的态度,并试图以其援助义务取而代之。以查尔斯·贝兹等人为代表的世界主义者和以塞缪尔·弗里曼等人为代表的罗尔斯的辩护者围绕罗尔斯对全球分配正义原则的拒斥产生了激烈的纷争,纷争的核心在于是否存在全球基本结构。事实上,罗尔斯对全球分配正义原则的拒斥是难以获得辩护的,其援助义务并不足以替代全球分配正义原则。

John Rawls rejects the global distributive justice, and tries to replace it with a duty of assistance. Charles R. Beitz and Samuel Freeman dispute the following question, could John Rawls successfully reject the global distributive justice？ In fact, Rawls＇s rejection of global distributive jus- tice is unsuccessful, and the aid of assistance is not sufficient to replace the global distributive justice.