期刊文献+

The Optical Diagnosis of Underwater Positive Sparks and Corona Discharges

The Optical Diagnosis of Underwater Positive Sparks and Corona Discharges
下载PDF
导出
摘要 In this paper, two types of underwater discharges, spark discharge and corona discharge, are investigated by optical diagnosis using a high speed framing camera (HSFC) with the framing time within nanoseconds under the same experimental conditions. In order to capture the photographs of streamer propagation, the influence of the randomicity of the prebreakdown duration is taken into consideration. By increasing the conductivity of water, the randomicity reduces effectively. Experimental results show that, for a spark discharge, the process can be separated into three stages: the generation and propagation of a streamer, the generation and expansion of the discharge channel, and the development and annihilation of the plasma. The streamers do not directly move to the opposite electrode, but form a bush-like figure. With the increase of the number of branches, the velocity of streamer propagation slows down. The trajectory of the initial channel between electrodes is not straight. However, with the channel expanding, its shape transforms into a straight column. For a corona discharge, there are two stages: the generation and propagation of a streamer, and the stagnation and annihilation of the streamer. The initial streamer in a corona discharge is generated later than in a spark discharge. The forms of streamers for both kinds of discharge are similar; however, streamers generated by a corona discharge propagate with a slower velocity and the number of branches is less compared with a spark discharge. When the energy injection stops, the luminescence of plasma inside the discharge channel (spark discharge) or streamers (corona discharge) becomes weaker and weaker, and finally disappears. In this paper, two types of underwater discharges, spark discharge and corona discharge, are investigated by optical diagnosis using a high speed framing camera (HSFC) with the framing time within nanoseconds under the same experimental conditions. In order to capture the photographs of streamer propagation, the influence of the randomicity of the prebreakdown duration is taken into consideration. By increasing the conductivity of water, the randomicity reduces effectively. Experimental results show that, for a spark discharge, the process can be separated into three stages: the generation and propagation of a streamer, the generation and expansion of the discharge channel, and the development and annihilation of the plasma. The streamers do not directly move to the opposite electrode, but form a bush-like figure. With the increase of the number of branches, the velocity of streamer propagation slows down. The trajectory of the initial channel between electrodes is not straight. However, with the channel expanding, its shape transforms into a straight column. For a corona discharge, there are two stages: the generation and propagation of a streamer, and the stagnation and annihilation of the streamer. The initial streamer in a corona discharge is generated later than in a spark discharge. The forms of streamers for both kinds of discharge are similar; however, streamers generated by a corona discharge propagate with a slower velocity and the number of branches is less compared with a spark discharge. When the energy injection stops, the luminescence of plasma inside the discharge channel (spark discharge) or streamers (corona discharge) becomes weaker and weaker, and finally disappears.
出处 《Plasma Science and Technology》 SCIE EI CAS CSCD 2014年第12期1100-1105,共6页 等离子体科学和技术(英文版)
关键词 spark discharge corona discharge optical diagnosis HSFC spark discharge, corona discharge, optical diagnosis, HSFC
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Hofmann J, Weise T H G G. 1997, Pulsed power tech- nologies for commercial material reduction and crush- ing applications. 11th IEEE Pulsed Power Conference, Baltimore.
  • 2Coleman A J, Saunders J E, Preston R C, et al. 1987, Ultrason. Med. Biol., 13:651.
  • 3Delius M, Jordan M, Eizenhoefer H, et al. 1989, U1- trason. Med. Biol., 14:689.
  • 4Locke B R, Sata M, Sunka P, et al. 2006, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 45:882.
  • 5Winsor N. 1997, Technology Report for United States Navy and Marine Corps, 2000-2035, National Academy Press, Washington.
  • 6D.C. Weise T H G G, Hofmann J, Lof[ler M J. 1995, Frag- mentation of composite materials by electrothermally generated pressure pulses. 10th IEEE Pulsed Power Conference, Albuquerque.
  • 7Hamelin M, Kitzinger F, Pronko S, et al. 1993, Hard rock fragmentation with pulsed power. 9th IEEE Pulsed Power Conference, Albuquerque.
  • 8Buogo S, Cannelli G B, D'Ottavi E, et al. 1998, Acus- tica., 84:1025.
  • 9Oison A H, Sutton S P. 1993, J. Aeoust. Soc. Am., 94: 2226.
  • 10Jomni F, Aitken F, Denat A. 2000, J. Aeoust. Soe. Am., 107:1203.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部