期刊文献+

微小RNA-143和微小RNA-29a对膀胱癌细胞的影响及其与Ras相关结构域家族1A基因甲基化的关系 被引量:2

Cell proliferation and invasion in microRNA-143 and microRNA-29a transfected bladder cancer cells and its relationship of ras association domain family 1A methylation
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的 观察微小RNA(miR)-143和miR-29a对T24膀胱癌细胞株生长、侵袭能力的影响,并探讨其与Ras相关结构域家族1A(RASSF1A)基因甲基化的关系.方法 化学合成miR-143和miR-29a的模拟物(mimics),并转染T24膀胱癌细胞株.通过逆转录-聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)验证miRNA mimics的转染效果.根据转染mimics的不同,分为WT组(不作任何处理的T24细胞)、NC组(转入不含miRNA的mimics的阴性对照)、M1组(转入含miR-143的mimics)、M2组(转入含miR-29a的mimics).利用流式细胞仪检测各组细胞凋亡率和细胞周期改变,Transwell法检测细胞侵袭能力,RT-PCR和Western blot检测RASSF1A基因转录水平和蛋白质表达,甲基化特异性PCR(MSP)检测RASSF1A基因甲基化状态.结果 RT-PCR证实两组mimics转染成功.WT、NC、M1和M2组的细胞凋亡率分别为2.5%、3.4%、12.4%和13.3%.M1和M2组S期细胞有所增加.NC、M1和M2组细胞侵袭抑制率分别为2.0%、16.5%和13.2%,M1和M2转染组高于NC组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05).RT-PCR和Western blot检测显示,转染miR-29a的M2组RASSF1A基因转录水平和蛋白质含量较NC组增加,但与M1组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05).MSP检测结果显示,WT、NC和M1组RASSF1A基因均呈完全甲基化,M2组呈部分甲基化状态.结论 转染miR-143和miR-29a可使T24膀胱癌细胞株细胞凋亡增加、侵袭能力减弱.转染miR-29a可以部分抑制RASSF1A基因甲基化,从而使该基因转录水平和蛋白质表达增加. Objective To evaluate the relationship among bladder cancer cell proliferation and invasion,microRNA-143 and 29a,and ras association domain family 1A (RASSF1A) methylation.Methods MiR-143 and miR-29a mimics were transfected to T24 cell lines.Transfection efficiency was confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).All cell lines were divided into four groups:WT group (wild T24 cell lines without any treatment),NC group (transfected by negative control mimics),M1 group (transfected by miR-143 mimics) and M2 group (transfected by miR-29a mimics).Apoptosis rates,cell cycle,cell invasive inhibitor rates,RASSF1 A gene expression and methylation were detected.Results Transfection was successful confirmed by RT-PCR.Apoptosis rates of WT,NC,M1 and M2 group were 2.5%,3.4%,12.4% and 13.3% respectively.S-phase cells in M1 and M2 group increased significantly.Cell invasive inhibitor rates of NC,M1 and M2 group were 2.0%,16.5% and 13.2% respectively which showed the rates in M1 and M2 group were higher than NC group (P 〈0.05).RASSF1A gene expression was upgraded in M2 group and no changes were found in M1 group.What's more,MSP results showed that RASSF1 A gene was partial methylated in M2 group while it was completely methylated in other groups.Conclusion T24 bladder cancer cell proliferation and invasion decreased after miR-143 and miR-29a transfected.miR-29a transfection may inhibit RASSF1 A gene methylation and lead to gene expression uploaded.
出处 《中华实验外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第12期2693-2696,共4页 Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery
关键词 微小RNA 膀胱癌 Ras相关结构域家族1A 甲基化 转染 MicroRNA Bladder cancer Ras association domain family 1A Methylation Transfection
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献18

  • 1HsinPaiLI,YuWeiLEU,YuSunCHANG.Epigenetic changes in virus-associated human cancers[J].Cell Research,2005,15(4):262-271. 被引量:12
  • 2乔忠杰,王国民,刘银坤.高复发性膀胱移行细胞癌基因组非平衡性的变化[J].中华实验外科杂志,2005,22(7):871-872. 被引量:5
  • 3陈道荣,王丕龙,黄爱龙,张秉强.沉默dnmt1基因对胃癌细胞株AGS细胞周期、增殖及凋亡的影响[J].癌症,2006,25(3):308-314. 被引量:4
  • 4Esteller M. Relevance of DNA methylation in the management of cancer[J]. Lancet Oncol, 2003,4(6) :351-358.
  • 5Ortiz-Vega S, Khokhlatchev A, Nedwidek M, et al. The putative tumor suppressor RASSFt A homodimerizes and heterodimerizes with the Ras-GTP binding protein Norel [ J ]. Oncogene, 2002,21 (9) : 1381-1390.
  • 6Guo G, Wang W, Bradley A. Mismatch repair genes identified using genetic screens in blm-defieient embryonic stem ceils[ J]. Nature, 2004,429(32) :891-895.
  • 7Kantarjian HM, O' Brien SM, Estey E, et al. Decitabine studies in chronic and acute myelogenous leukemia [ J ]. Leukemia, 1997,11 ( 1 ) :35-36.
  • 8Herman JG, Graff JR, Myohanen S, et al. Methylation-specific PCR: a novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands [ J ]. Proc Nail Acad Sci USA, 1996,93(18) : 9821-9826.
  • 9Jones PA, Baylin SB. The fundamental role of epigenetics events in cancer[J]. Nat Rev Genet, 2002,3(6) :415-417.
  • 10顾方六.膀胱肿瘤的诊断和治疗见:吴阶平,主编.吴阶平泌尿外科.第2版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2004.945-953.

共引文献19

同被引文献30

  • 1Jiang Z, Chu PG, Woda BA, et al. combination of quantitative IMP3 and tumor stage: a new system to predict metastasis for patients with localized renal cell eareinomas[J]. Clin Cancer Res,2008,14(17) :5579 -5584.
  • 2Ljungberg B,Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update[J]. Eur Urol, 2010, 58 (3) :398-406.
  • 3Mitchell PS, Parkin RK, Kroh EM, et al. Circulating microRNAs as stable blood-based markers for cancer detection[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A,2008,105(30): 10513- 10518.
  • 4Camargo RG, Quintas Teixeira Ribeiro H, Geraldo MV, et al. Cancer Cachexia and MicroRNAsEEB/OL]. Mediators Inflamm, 20151 367561. [2015 -09-20]. httpz//www, ncbi. nlm. nih. gov/ pubmed/? term: Cancer- Cachexia- and- MicroRNAs+ 2015 +36756.
  • 5Zaman MS, Shahryari V, Deng G, et al. Up-regulation of mi croRNA-21 correlates with lower kidney cancer survival[J/CD]. PLoS One,2012,7(2) :e31060.
  • 6Li X,Xin S,He Z,et al. MicroRNA-21 (miR-21) post-transcrip- tionally downregulates tumor suppressor PDCD4 and promotes cell transformation, proliferation, and metastasis in renal cell car cinoma[J]. Cell Physiol Biochem, 2014 ,33 (6) : 1631- 1642.
  • 7Valad H,Ekstromk,Bossios A, et al. Exosomal-mediated trans- fer of mRNAs and microRNAs is a novel mechanism of genetic exchange between cells[J]. Nat cell Biol,2007,9(6):654-659.
  • 8Gilad S,Meiri E,Yogev Y,et al. Serum microRNAs are promis- ing novel biomarkers[J/CD]. PLoS One, 2008,3 : e3148.
  • 9Zhu D,Pan C,Li L,et al. MicroRNA-17/20a/106a modulate macro- phage inflammatory responses through targeting signal regulatory protein a[J]. J Allergy Clin Immunol,2013,132(2) :426-436.
  • 10Zhu M,Zhang N,He S,et al. MicroRNA-106a targets TIMP2 to regulate invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer[J]. FEBS Lett, 2014,588(4) :600-607.

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部