期刊文献+

成都-拉萨所需导航性能(RNP4)平行航路安全性评估研究 被引量:6

Safety Assessment of RNP4 Chengdu-Lasa Parallel Routes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 根据中国民航基于性能导航(PBN)实施路线图,2017年后,PBN航路将达到100%。目前,成都-拉萨RNP4平行航路正在协调实施。对成都-拉萨RNP4平行航路的安全评估进行了研究。首先运用改进的REICH模型介绍了平行航路碰撞风险的计算方法。其次,分析了侧向重叠概率的计算方法。侧向重叠概率由一般偏航和大偏航两部分组成。有别于之前的研究,采用更接近于实际运行现状的分离的双指数分布来描述大偏航密度函数。最后对成都-拉萨RNP4平行航路的碰撞风险进行了评估。评估结果满足安全目标水平的要求,也表明该方法是可行的。 According to China' s PBN implementation roadmap,PBN based on the instrument flight procedures will be implemented to all ATS routes after 2017.At present,Chengdu-Lasa RNP4 parallel routes is designed.This paper presents the safety assessment for the implementation of Chengdu-Lasa RNP4 parallel routes.Firstly,the methodology of collision risk of parallel routes is introduced by improved REICH model.Then,the method of lateral overlap probability is analyzed.The lateral overlap probability is divided into two parts-the core distribution and the non-core distribution.Unlike the most of previous research,the non-core distribution obey "Separated Double Exponential" distribution which is more realistic in this paper.Finally,the collision risk of Chengdu-Lasa RNP4 parallel routes is carried out.The estimate of collision risk satisfies the target level of safety value and indicates that the method is feasible.
出处 《科学技术与工程》 北大核心 2014年第29期308-311,共4页 Science Technology and Engineering
基金 中国民航飞行学院科研基金项目(J2012-48) 国家科技支撑计划课题(2011BAH24B11)资助
关键词 安全评估 平行航路 所需导航性能(RNP) 重叠概率 分离的双指数分布 safety assessment parallel routes RNP lateral overlap probability separated double exponential distribution
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Manual on airspace planning methodology for the detemination of separation minima,first edition,Doc 9689-AN/953,International Civil Aviation Organization,Montreal,1998.
  • 2Reich P G.Analysis of long-range air traffic systems:separation standards Ⅰ.J Navigation,1966;19(1):88-98.
  • 3Reich P G.Analysis of long-range air traffic systems:Separation standards Ⅱ.J Navigation,1966;19(2):169-186.
  • 4Reich P G.Analysis of long-range air traffic systems:Separation standards-Ⅲ.J Navigation,1966 ;19 (3):332-347.
  • 5Lutz M G E,Mosberg W.Risk assessment of RNP10 and RVSM in the South Atlantic flight identification regions.http:// www.satmasat.com/ARINCFinal.pdf.2001.
  • 6India.Airspace analysis of bay of Bengal Arabian sea region safety assessment of RNP10 ATS routes L510,N571,P628 & P762.The 14th Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safety Monitoring Advisory Group; Bangkok:International Civil Aviation Organization,2011:1-40.
  • 7South East Asia Safety Monitoring Agency.Assessment of the safety of 50-NM lateral and 50-NM longitudinal separation standards on RNAV routes M635 and M774.Fifth Meeting of the Southeast Asia Route Review Task Force; Bangkok:International Civil Aviation Organization,2011:1-12.
  • 8FAA Technical Center.Safety assessment to support use of the 30-NM lateral and 30-NM longitudinal separation standards in Anchorage Oceanic and Offshore Airspace.The Sixteenth Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safety Monitoring Advisory Group; Bangkok:International Civil Aviation Organization,2012:1-48.
  • 9Han J H,Kim C H,Cho H S.Safety assessment of RNAV ATS routes Y71 and Y72.The 17th Meeting of the Regional Airspace Safety Monitoring Advisory Group ; Bangkok:International Civil Aviation Organization,2012:1-13.
  • 10韩松臣,裴成功,隋东,左凌.平行区域导航航路安全性分析[J].航空学报,2006,27(6):1023-1027. 被引量:36

二级参考文献30

  • 1侯志祥,吴义虎,刘振闻,李河清.高速公路汽车追尾模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2004,4(4):37-39. 被引量:10
  • 2朱代武.低空空域飞行冲突避让算法[J].交通运输工程学报,2005,5(3):73-76. 被引量:20
  • 3张兆宁,张晓燕,李冬宾.基于VOR导航的平行航路侧向碰撞率计算模型[J].交通运输工程学报,2007,7(3):21-24. 被引量:28
  • 4REICH P G. Analysis of long-range air traffic systems: separation standards Ⅰ [J]. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 1966, 19(1): 88-98.
  • 5REICH P G. Analysis of long-range air traffic systems: separation standards-Ⅱ[J]. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 1966, 19(2):169-186.
  • 6REICH P G, Analysis of long range air traffic systems: separation standards-Ⅲ [J]. Journal of the Institute of Navigation, 1966, 19(3): 331-347.
  • 7BAKKER G J, BLOM H A P. Air traffic collision risk modeling[C] // IEEE. Proceedings of the 32nd Conference on Decision and Control. San Antonio: IEEE, 1993: 1464 1469.
  • 8BROOKER P. Longitudinal collision risk for ATC track systems: a hazardous event model[J]. The Journal of Navigation, 2006, 59(1) : 55-70.
  • 9BLOM H A P, BAKKER G J, BLANKER P J G, et al. Accident risk assessment for advanced ATM[C]// National Aerospace Laboratory. Proceedings of the 2nd USA/Europe Air Traffic Management R&D Seminar. Orlando: National Aerospace Laboratory, 1998: 3-26.
  • 10ANDREWS A. Method for error budgeting of inertial navigation systems[J]. Journal of Guidance and Control, 1979, 2(5) :438-440.

共引文献62

同被引文献41

引证文献6

二级引证文献25

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部