期刊文献+

肾上腺素刺激试验在糖原累积症Ⅰ型及Ⅲ型分型中的诊断价值 被引量:2

Diagnostic Value of Epinephrine Stimulation Test in Distinguishing Type Ⅰand Type Ⅲ Glycogen Storage Diseases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨肾上腺素刺激试验在糖原累积症(glycogen storage disease,GSD)Ⅰ型、Ⅲ型分型中的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析北京协和医院1991年3月至2012年2月收治的经基因确诊的GSDⅠ型及Ⅲ型患者的临床资料,所有患者均完成空腹及餐后肾上腺素刺激试验。以基因诊断结果为金标准,分析空腹及餐后肾上腺素刺激试验对GSDⅠ型及Ⅲ型分型的诊断价值。结果 144例GSD患者中,男88例,女56例,平均年龄(5.77±4.58)岁;Ⅰa型68例,Ⅰb型20例,Ⅲ型56例。144例患者空腹刺激试验血糖均未明显增高。餐后刺激试验血糖明显升高44例,其中Ⅰ型8例,Ⅲ型36例,两组有效应患者的比例差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。餐后肾上腺素刺激试验诊断GSDⅠ型的敏感度和特异度分别为90.9%和64.3%;诊断Ⅲ型的敏感度和特异度分别为64.3%和90.9%。年龄≤2.5岁较>2.5岁患者餐后刺激试验有效应者的比例差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。年龄越大,肾上腺素刺激试验诊断敏感度和特异度越高。肾上腺素刺激试验诊断年龄>2.5岁的Ⅰ型患者的敏感度和特异度分别为95.4%和77.1%,诊断年龄>2.5岁的Ⅲ型患者的敏感度和特异度分别为77.1%和95.4%。结论肾上腺素刺激试验对GSDⅠ型和Ⅲ型的临床分型仍具有一定意义,尤其2.5岁以上的GSD患者结果可靠性更高。 Objective To analyze the value of epinephrine stimulation test in distinguishing type Ⅰand type Ⅲglycogen storage diseases ( GSD) .Methods The clinical data of genetically diagnosed type Ⅰand ⅢGSD patients from March 1991 to February 2012 in Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively analyzed .All the patients finished fasting and postprandial epinephrine stimulation test .The diagnostic value of fasting and postprandial epinephrine stimulation test was evaluated against gene diagnosis as the gold standard . Results Totally, 144 GSD patients (88 males and 56 females) with an average age of (5.77 ±4.58 ) years were included .There were 68 cases of GSD type Ⅰa, 20 cases of GSD type Ⅰb, and 56 cases of GSD type Ⅲ. Fasting epinephrine stimulation test showed no significant increase in blood glucose level in all the 144 patients, while postprandial epinephrine stimulation test exhibited that blood glucose level significantly increased in 44 cases , including 8 cases of type Ⅰand 36 cases of type Ⅲ, with significant difference in the percentage of patients effective to the test between the two types ( P〈0.01 ) .The sensitivity and specificity of postprandial epinephrine stimulation test in diagnosing GSD type Ⅰwere 90.9%and 64.3%, respectively , and those in diagnosing GSD type Ⅲwere 64.3%and 90.9%, respectively .The sensitivity and specificity in patients ≤2.5 years old were significantly lower than those in patients 〉2.5 years old (P〈0.01).In patients 〉2.5 years, the sensitivity and specificity of epinephrine stimulation test were 95.4%and 77.1%in GSD Ⅰ, and 77.1%and 95.4%in GSD type Ⅲ.Conclusion Epinephrine stimulation test still can be helpful in distinguishing GSD type Ⅰ and GSD type Ⅲ, especially liable in patients 〉2.5 years old .
出处 《协和医学杂志》 2014年第4期389-392,共4页 Medical Journal of Peking Union Medical College Hospital
关键词 糖原累积症 肾上腺素刺激试验 基因诊断 glycogen storage disease epinephrine stimulation test gene diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Froissart R, Piraud M, Boudjemline AM, et al. Glucose-6- phosphatase deficiency [J]. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2011, 6: 27.
  • 2邱正庆,魏珉.中国人常见糖原累积症111例基因分型研究.中华医学会第五次全国儿科中青年学术交流大会[C].济南:中华医学会,2008.
  • 3Rake JP, Visser G, Labrune P, et al. Glycogen storage disease type I: diagnosis, management, clinical course and outcome. Results of the European Study on Glycogen Storage Disease Type 1 (ESGSD I) [J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2002, 161: 20-34.
  • 4Visser G, Rake JP, Labrune P, et al. Consensus guidelines for management of glycogen storage disease type l b-European Study on Glycogen Storage Disease Type 1 [ J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2002, 161: S120-S123.
  • 5Austin SL, Proia AD, Spencer-Manzon M J, et al. Cardiac pathology in glycogen storage disease type m [ J ]. JIMD Rep, 2012, 6: 65-72.
  • 6Rake JP, Visser G, Labrune P, et al. Guidelines for man- agement of glycogen storage disease type I -European Study on Glycogen Storage Disease Type I (ESGSD I ) [J]. Eur J Pediatr, 2002, 161: Sl12-Sl19.
  • 7Kishnani PS, Austin SL, Arn P, et al. Glycogen storage dis- ease type m diagnosis and management guidelines [J]. Gen- et Med, 2010, 12: 446-463.
  • 8胡亚美,江载芳.诸福棠实用儿科学[M].7版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2002:632-636.

共引文献1910

同被引文献64

  • 1陈琳,郭玉璞,任海涛,赵燕环,关鸿志,管宇宙,彭斌,刘大为.少年起病的Ⅱ型糖原累积病五例临床病理研究[J].中华神经科杂志,2005,38(1):51-54. 被引量:16
  • 2傅立军,窦薇,周爱卿,黄美蓉,杨健萍,李奋.糖原累积病Ⅱ型的临床分析和基因学检测[J].临床儿科杂志,2006,24(12):962-965. 被引量:12
  • 3仇佳晶,魏珉,张为民,施惠平.幼年起病的2例晚发型糖原贮积症Ⅱ型/Pompe病临床和基因分析[J].中华儿科杂志,2007,45(10):760-764. 被引量:11
  • 4张在强,孙异临,张星虎,王拥军.以呼吸障碍为突出表现的Ⅱ型糖元累积病21例分析[J].中国神经精神疾病杂志,2007,33(10):581-584. 被引量:4
  • 5Oldfors A, DiMauro S. New insights in the field of muscle glycogenoses[ J]. Curr Opin Neurol, 2013, 26 (5) : 544-553. DOI: 10. 1097/WCO. 0b013e328364dbdc.
  • 6Gtingsr D,de Vries JM, Hop WC, et al. Survival and associated factors in 268 adults with Pompe disease prior to treatment with enzyme replacement therapy[ J]. Orphanet J Rare Dis, 2011, 6: 34. DOI: 10.1186/1750-1172-6-34.
  • 7Sandhu D, Rizvi A, Kim J, et al. Diffuse cerebral microhemorrhages in a patient with adult-onset Pompe's disease: a case report[J]. J Vasc Interv Neurol, 2014, 7(5) : 82-85.
  • 8Van der Ploeg AT, Reuser AJ. Pompe's disease [ J ]. Lancet, 2008, 372 (9646): 1342-1353. DOI: 10. 1016/S0140-6736 (08) 61555-X.
  • 9Vissing J, Lukacs Z, Straub V. Diagnosis of Pompe disease: muscle biopsy vs blood-based assays [ J ]. JAMA Neurol, 2013, 70(7) : 923-927. DOI: 10. 1001/2013.
  • 10jamaneurol. 486. Kumamoto S, Katafuchi T, Nakamura K, et al. High frequency of acid a-glucosidase pseudodeficiency complicates newborn screening for glycogen storage disease type 11 in the Japanese population[ J ]. Mol Genet Metab, 2009, 97 (3) : 190-195. DOI: 10. 1016/j. ymgme. 2009.03. 004.

引证文献2

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部