期刊文献+

基于课堂话语的高中英语教师身份建构研究 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 一、引言 “我是谁”是一个具备深刻学理内涵的哲学命题。这个关涉“身份”的问题为2l世纪的教师研究掀开了崭新的一页(张倩,2012)。近年来,将教师话语同身份相结合的社会性研究被看作是深化教师职业发展以及提升教师职业批评意识的重要突破点(贺娟,2011)。
出处 《中小学英语教学与研究》 北大核心 2014年第12期48-54,F0003,共8页 English Teaching & Research Notes
基金 本文为2012年度教育部人文社科项目(12YJC740077)和2013年度教育部人文社科项目(13YJA740078)的阶段性成果,同时得到哈尔滨工程大学研究生精品课程建设项目资助.
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Brewer, M.B. & Gardner, W. (1996) Who 2014. 12. 总 299is this "we" ? Levels of collective identity and self - rep- resentation. Journal of Personality and Social. Psychol- ogy, 71(1) : 83 -93.
  • 2Brown, P. &Levinson, S. (1987) Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, Eng- land: Cambridge University Press.
  • 3Button, G. & Casey, N. (1984) Generating topic : The use of topic initial elicitors. In J. M. Atkinson & J. C. Heritage ( eds. ) , Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis ( pp. 160 - 197 ). Cam- bridge, England : Cambridge University Press.
  • 4Cazden, C.B. (1988) Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Portsmouth, NH : Heinemann.
  • 5Cooper, K. &Olson, M.R. (1996) Themul- tiple " I" s of teacher identity. In M. Kompf, W. R. Bond, D. Dworet & R.T. Boak ( Eds. ), Changing Re- search and Practice: Teachers' Professionalism, Identities and Knowledge ( pp. 78 - 89 ). London/Washington, DC: The Flamer Press.
  • 6Dyer, J. & Keller-Cohen, D. ( 2000 ) The discursive construction of professional self through narra- tives of personal experience. Discourse Studies, 2 ( 3 ) : 283 - 304.
  • 7Fairelough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • 8Fairclough, N. ( 1995 ) Critical Discourse A- nalysis : The Critical Study of Language. London : Long- man.
  • 9Hermer6n, L. (1978) On Modality in Eng- lish: A Study of the Semantics of the Modals. Lund: CWK Gleerup.
  • 10Holmes, T.H. & Rahe, R.H. (1967) The social readjustment rating scale. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 11(2) : 213 -218.

二级参考文献47

  • 1高一虹.心理咨询语言指示性的量化分析[J].语言文字应用,1998(1):54-60. 被引量:7
  • 2Andersen, G. &K. Aijmer. 2011. Pragmatics of Society [M]. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  • 3Bousfield, D. 2008. Impoliteness in Interaction [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 4Culpeper, J. 2005. Impoliteness and entertainment in televisions quiz show [J]. Journal of Politeness Research 1: 35-72.
  • 5Culpeper, J. 2011. Impoliteness: Using Language to Cause Offence [M]. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 6D'hondt, S., J. Ostman & J. Verschueren (eds.). 2009. The Pragmatics of Interaction [C]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • 7Garmendia, J. 2011. Critical pragmatics for explaining errors, lies and ironies [A]. In IPrA (ed.). Abstracts for the 12^th International Pragmatics Conference [C]. Manchester, UK. p.429.
  • 8Giora, R. 1997: Understanding figurative and literal language: The graded salience hypothesis [J]. Cognitive Linguistics 8: 183-206.
  • 9Giora, R. 2003. On our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language [M]. Oxford: OUP.
  • 10Ishihara, N. &A. Cohen (eds.). 2010. Teaching and Leaning Pragrnatics [C]. London: Longman.

共引文献68

同被引文献10

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部