期刊文献+

不完全信息下的最优反倾销税率政策分析 被引量:2

Analysis of the Optimal Antidumping Duty Policy under Incomplete Information
下载PDF
导出
摘要 笔者通过拓展Katrak的贸易政策分析模型,引入反映通货膨胀的贴现因子1,从而构建了外国垄断企业与进口国政府之间的多期信号博弈,对在完全和不完全成本信息下的政府最优反倾销税率政策分别进行了分析,得出在完全成本信息下,最优反倾销税率与外国企业成本成反比,与通货膨胀(贴现因子)无关。而在不完全成本信息下,当通货膨胀大时,不同成本类型的企业分别按各自的最优产量出口,此时歧视性反倾销税率政策较优;当通货膨胀小时,无论企业的成本类型是高成本还是低成本,它将以同样的产量出口,歧视性反倾销税率政策将不能保证国家福利最大化,此时单一税率政策更优。 Through expanding Katrak's model of commercial policy and introducing the inflation expectation—the discount factor,we analyzed the governmental optimal antidumping duty rate policy under the complete and incomplete cost's information by constructing the multi-period signaling game between foreign monopolist and the government of importing country. We conclude that the optimal antidumping duty rate has nothing to do with the inflation expectation—the discount factor and is in inverse proportion of foreign manufacturer's cost in the complete cost information. While in the incomplete cost information,the manufacturer will export in optimal quantity reflects its real cost type when the inflation expectation is high,the discriminate antidumping duty rate policy will be better in this condition. When the inflation expectation is low,then the manufacturer will export the same quantity whether it's cost is high or not,the discriminatory antidumping duty rate policy can't secure the maximization of national welfare,then the uniform duty rate policy will be better.
作者 刘锦芳
出处 《中央财经大学学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第12期18-28,共11页 Journal of Central University of Finance & Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目"我国企业应对反倾销的会计信息证据效力保障机制研究(71272068)" 湖南省自然科学基金青年项目"基于信息审计的我国企业反倾销机制研究"(2015JJ3061) 湖南省财政厅课题"基于会计支持的企业应对反倾销的协调机制研究(湘财教指[2012]238号)" 湖南省教育厅科学研究项目"企业应对反倾销的会计信息响应机制研究(14C0330)"
关键词 反倾销税率政策 动态信号博弈 不完全信息 贴现因子 Anti-dumping duties policy Dynamic signaling game Incomplete information Discount factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献58

  • 1钟根元,周斌,许源.不完全信息动态博弈下反倾销税率优化模型[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2006,38(1):104-106. 被引量:11
  • 2Kolev D R,Prusa T J.Tariff policy for a monopolist in a signaling game[J].Journal of International Economics,1999,49:51-76.
  • 3Cassing J,To T.Antidumping,signaling and cheap talk[J].Journal of International Economics,2008,75:373-382.
  • 4.[EB/OL].WTO网站,.
  • 5瓦伊纳.2003:《倾销:国际贸易中的一个问题》,中译本,商务印书馆
  • 6Baron D, Besanko D, 1984, "Regulation, Asymmetric Information, and Auditing", RAND Journal of Economics, 15, p.447-470.
  • 7Baron D, Myerson R, 1982, "Regulating a Monopolist with Unknown Costs", Econometrica, 50 p.911-930.
  • 8Blonigen, Bown C.P, 2003, "Antidumping and Retaliation Threats", Journal of International Economics, 60, P. 249-273.
  • 9Blonigen, Prusa, T.J, 2001, "Antidumping", No 8398 in NBER Working Papers.
  • 10Brander, Spencer, 1985, "Expert Subsidies and Intemational Market Share Rivalry" Journal of lnternationol Economics, 18, p. 83-100.

共引文献24

同被引文献16

  • 1钟根元,周斌,许源.不完全信息动态博弈下反倾销税率优化模型[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2006,38(1):104-106. 被引量:11
  • 2Kohler p, Moore M 0. Injury-Based Protection with Auditing under Imperfect Information [J]. Southern Economic Journal, 2001, 68 (1) : 42 -59.
  • 3Matschke X, Schttner A. Antidumping as Strategic Trade Policy under Asymmetric Information [J]. Southern Economic Journal, 2013 , 80 (1) : 81 -105.
  • 4Grossman G, Helpman E. Protection for Sale [ J]. American Economic Review, 1994,84: 833 - 850.
  • 5Goldberg P, Maggi G. Protection for Sale : An Empirical Investigation [ J ]. American Economic Review, 1999,89: 1135 - 1155.
  • 6Kroszner R, Stratman T. What Drives Deregulation? Economics and politics of the Relaxation of Bank Branching Restrictions [ J]. Quarterly Journalof Economics, 1999,114: 1437 -1467.
  • 7Gawande K,Krishna P, Olarreaga M. Lobbying Competition over Trade Policy [R]. NBER Working Paper, 2005 , Vol. 11371.
  • 8Bombardini M,Trebbi F. Competition and Political Organization: Together or Alone in Lobbying for Trade Policy? [ J]. Journal of International Eco-nomics, 2012,87: 18 -26.
  • 9Gawande K, Krishna P, Olarreaga M. Lobbying Competition over Trade Policy [ J]. International Economic Review. 2012,53 (1) : 115 - 132.
  • 10漆鑫,朱彤.不完全信息、反倾销威胁下的最优出口贸易政策——以审计政策为信息甄别工具[J].国际经贸探索,2009,25(4):71-75. 被引量:3

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部