期刊文献+

基于CVM的耕地保护外部性估算与检验 被引量:11

Calculating and testing cultivated land protection externality using Contingent Valuation Method
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为了科学评估耕地保护的外部性,在耕地利用效益体系重构和耕地保护外部性界定的基础上,基于条件价值评估法(CVM)构建了耕地保护外部性测度、分析和检验一体化的方法体系,并以河南省焦作市为研究区域进行了实证应用。研究结果表明:1耕地生态社会效益属于一种纯粹的、具有正外部性和私人(主要为农户)联合提供的混合类跨区域性公共物品,可以运用CVM等非市场价值评估法进行估算。2受访者的支付意愿较大程度地受社会经济发展水平的制约和影响,农户和城镇居民对耕地生态社会效益认知度的高低是造成城镇居民与农户支付率差异的重要影响因素。3基于CVM测算出的焦作市耕地整体外部性为1.91亿元·a-1,耕地保护外部性为993.7元·hm-2·a-1,该测算结果可作为耕地保护外部性补偿的最低标准。4CVM的有效性与可靠性检验是CVM理论、方法和实践内容的重要组成部分,可通过问卷设计优化、预调查、问卷内容修正、合理的询价方式、不同估算方法的对照分析、同一方法重复试验等手段进行有效性与可靠性检验;检验结果表明,CVM进行耕地保护外部性估算的可靠性和有效性较高。 This paper proposed the Contingent Valuation Method(CVM) for estimating cultivated land protection externality. The proposed CVM was based on reconstruction of cultivated land utilization benefit system and defined cultivated land protection externality. The paper discussed in detail specific techniques of sample size and distribution, determination of leading technology,pay/compensation interval setting, hypothetical market scenario setting, evasion of deviation, pretreatment of survey data, and results validity/reliability tests. The results showed that ecological and social benefits of cultivated lands included public goods with mixed classes across categories. These classes were provided by joint ventures between the pure positive externalities and the private sector(mainly farmers). This could be estimated by using CVM and other non-market valuation methods. The willingness to pay of interviewee for this service was heavily restricted and influenced by their levels of socioeconomic development. The recognition of ecological and social benefits of cultivated lands of farmers and urban residents formed the main causality factor for the differences in payment ratio between urban residents and rural farmers. Urban residents were more familiar with ecological and social benefits of cultivated lands than rural/farm households. This was probably a key factor influencing the willingness to pay for ecological services.Farm households preferred voluntary labor as mean of payment, while both money and voluntary labor were more preferred by urban residents. The probable reason for this was that farm households had more leisure time than urban residents. Unitary cultivated land protection externality for Jiaozuo City was 1.91×10^8 Yuan·a^-1 and the cultivated land protection externality per unit area of cultivatedland was 993.7 Yuan·hm^-2·a^-1 base on CVM. CVM validity and reliability test was a critical element of CVM theory, method and practice. This was obtained through questionnaire optimization, pre-survey, questionnaire revision, rational inquiry, comparative analysis of different estimation methods, and repeated tests of the same method. The test results showed it was reliable and valid to use CVM estimating the cultivated land protection externality.
出处 《中国生态农业学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第12期1498-1508,共11页 Chinese Journal of Eco-Agriculture
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41371524) 教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(11YJC790139) 中国博士后科学基金项目(2013M530337)资助
关键词 耕地保护 外部性估算 条件价值评估法 有效性检验 可靠性检验 Cultivated land protection Externality evaluation Contingent Valuation Method Validity test Reliability test
  • 相关文献

参考文献46

  • 1Davis R K. Recreation planning as an economic problem[J]. Natural Resources Journal, 1963(3): 239-249.
  • 2徐中民,张志强,龙爱华,陈东景,巩增泰,苏志勇,张勃,石惠春.额济纳旗生态系统服务恢复价值评估方法的比较与应用[J].生态学报,2003,23(9):1841-1850. 被引量:95
  • 3崔相宝,苗建军.条件价值评估:一种非市场的价值评估技术[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2005,18(6):802-807. 被引量:22
  • 4黄宗煌.台湾地区国家公园之游憩效益的评估[J].台湾银行季刊,1990,41(3):282-304.
  • 5陈信甫.游憩效益评估法之应用与比较--以绿岛为例[D].台湾:文化大学观光所,1995.
  • 6苏明达,吴骊瑛.愿意支付价值最佳效率指标之建构与验证[J].台湾农业经济丛刊,2004,9(2):27-60.
  • 7巫惠玲.福宝湿地发展生态旅游经济效益之研究[D].台湾逢甲大学,2002.
  • 8黄口珈.花莲市阿美族丰年祭文化资源整体效益之评估[D].台湾:逢甲大学.2002.
  • 9黄琼如,何艳宏,沈美慧.垃圾污染减量的效益评估:条件评估法之应用[C]//第五届台湾实证经济学研讨会,2003.
  • 10薛达元,ClemTisdell.环境物品的经济价值评估方法:条件价值法[J].农村生态环境,1999,15(3):39-43. 被引量:42

二级参考文献295

共引文献896

同被引文献199

引证文献11

二级引证文献182

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部