期刊文献+

论“内通”非“通感”——钱钟书道家通感论接读 被引量:2

The “Inner Commune”Is Not the “Synaesthesia”Qian Zhongshu's Misreading of Taoist Synaesthesia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 通感是文艺学上的一个核心话题,道家哲学亦为中国历代文艺家所青睐。在通感问题上,道家的见解如何,换言之,道家通感论有何特点,既是一个文艺学问题,也是一个哲学问题。钱钟书的《通感》一文以及其《管锥编》第二册"列子张湛注"编("黄帝"),对通感与庄子(耳目)"内通"关系的研究,为我们深入探讨此问题提供了一个良好的契机。在这两则文献中,钱钟书将庄子的"耳目内通"说成是文艺学上的"通感"。此说流传甚广,堪称"典论"。文章认为,二者不可如此简单地等同,它们之间存在着复杂的关系。"通感"属于庄子"内通"的初级阶段,而"内通"则是对"通感"的扬弃。将庄子的"内通"视作"通感",是对庄子的浅化。如同在老子那里,庄子的真髓也是"无",只有从"无"(感官)的角度理解"通感",才会意识到,如果说道家也有"通感"之论,那它只是被安排在一个初级位置,更等而下之的是"耳目不通"。文章虽起于对钱氏之将"内通"与"通感"相混同的质疑,但最终则是勾勒出道家通感论的基本结构和特征。 The synaesthesia is a core topic in the field of literary studies while the Taoist philosophy was attractive to the Chinese ancient literary people. Therefore, the Taoist view on synaesthesia, or in other words, what the characteristics of the Taoist theory of synaesthesia are, will not only concern literature, but also philosophy. Qian Zhongshu' s article "Synaesthesia" as well as the section "Zhang Zhan' s Annotated Lietzu" (Huangdi) from his book Guanzhui Bian, vol. 2, is a valuable chance for us to further explore the relation of Chuang-tzu' s "Inner Commune" and the literary synaesthesia. In the above-mentioned literature, Qian Zhongshu reads Chuang-tzu' s "Inner Commune between Eyes and Ears" as the literary "synaesthesia". This article argues otherwise that the two concepts can not be equated as simply as done by Qian. There is indeed a very complicated relationship between them. The literary "synaesthesia" belongs to the initial stage of Chuang - tzu' s "Inner Commune" while the "Inner Commune" is the Aufheben of that "synaesthesia". As in Lao-tzu, the essence of Chuang-tzu is "Nothing" or Non-Organ, only from which could one fully understand "synaesthesia", and realize that if there is something called "synaesthesia" in Taoism, that should be placed at the elementary level, and further lower is the non-commune between eyes and ears. This article aims not only to question Qian' s misreading of the "Inner Commune" as literary "synaesthesia", but also to sketch the basic structure of the Taoist synaesthesia.
作者 金惠敏
出处 《首都师范大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期40-45,共6页 Journal of Capital Normal University:Social Science Edition
关键词 钱钟书 庄子 通感 内通 大通 内视 Qian Zhongshu Chuang-tzu synaesthesia Inner Commune Great Commune Inner Sight
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1郭象注,成玄英疏.庄子注疏[M].北京:中华书局,2011.
  • 2高华平.论语集解校释[M].沈阳:辽海出版社,2011.
  • 3杨伯峻.列子集释[M].北京:中华书局,1979..
  • 4Martin Heidegger, Holzwege, Frankfurt a. Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2003.
  • 5Alain Badiou, Handbook of Inaesthetics, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.

共引文献180

同被引文献17

  • 1金惠敏.技术与感性——在麦克卢汉、海森伯和庄子之间的互文性阐释[J].文艺理论研究,2015(1):84-97. 被引量:5
  • 2郭象注,成玄英疏《庄子注疏》,曹础基,黄兰发整理,中华书局,2011年,第142页.
  • 3Jacques Derrida, De la grammatologie, Paris . Minuit, 1967, p. 345.
  • 4Jacques Derrida, L' ecriture et la diff6rence,Paris . Seuil, 1967 ,p. 314.
  • 5金惠敏.《自然与文化的解构限度-思考在德里达“之后”》,载金惠敏.《消费他者.全球化与资本主义的文化图景》,商务印书馆,2014年,第108页.
  • 6郭象注,成玄英疏.《庄子注疏》,第399页.
  • 7葛瑞汉.《论道者-中国古代哲学论辩》,张海晏译,中国社会科学出版社,2003年,第255页.
  • 8释德清.《道德经解》,黄曙辉点校,华东师范大学出版社,2009年,第76页.
  • 9张默生.《庄子研究答问》,载张默生原著,张翰勋校补.《庄子新释》,齐鲁书社,1993年,第17页.
  • 10Theodor W. Adomo, Negative Dialektik, in. ders. , Gesammehe Schrlften 6 ,Frankfurt am Main. Suhrkamp, 1996 [ 1970 ], S. 148.

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部