摘要
目的 探讨INTIMA封闭式留置针替代普通输液针进行临床输液治疗的应用效果 ,以利推广使用。方法 5 0例患者为观察组用INTIMA封闭式留置针进行静脉输液 ,70例患者为对照组用普通输液针进行静脉输液治疗 ,对两种输液方法的穿刺次数和液体渗漏等情况进行比较。结果 两组输液方法的穿刺次数经t检验 ,P <0 .0 1,差异有高度显著意义 ;对照组的渗漏率达 6 2 .86 %,观察组的渗漏率为 16 .0 0 %,经卡方检验 ,P <0 .0 1,两组差异有高度显著性意义。结论 以INTIMA封闭式留置针替代普通输液针 ,其操作简便 ,成功率高 ,副作用小 ,减少静脉穿刺次数 ,延长每次静脉穿刺的间隔时间 ,有效提高护理工作效率 ,应在临床上广泛推广应用。
Objective To probe the effect of INTIMA closed retaining needle replacing general transfusion needle to venous transfusion. Methods There were 50 cases of patients with INTIMA closed retaining needle to venous transfusion in the observation group; There were 70 cases of patients with general transfusion needle to venous transfusion in the control group. Then we compared the effect, including the times of puncture and exudation of liqor. Results The puncture times of two groups were different, by T-test, P<0.01. The exudation rate of control group was 62.86%; that of the observation group was 16.00%, by χ 2-test, P<0.01.Conclusions Replacing general transfusion needle with closed retaining needle, the operation is simple, successful rate is higher. It can also reduce the puncture time and raise the efficiency of nursing.
出处
《现代护理》
2002年第7期499-500,共2页
Modern Nursing