期刊文献+

中国对外直接投资区位选择的决定因素:制度、税负和资源禀赋 被引量:425

The Determinants of Location Choices of China's ODI:Institutions,Taxations and Resources
原文传递
导出
摘要 中国目前已经成为世界第三大对外直接投资(ODI)输出国。东道国(或地区)的不同制度维度是如何影响中国ODI的区位选择的?本文以中国2002-2011年间在全球范围内进行的842笔对外直接投资作为样本,研究了东道国的话语权与问责制、政治稳定与杜绝暴力/恐怖主义、政府效率、监管质量、法治水平、腐败控制这六类制度性因素对中国ODI区位选择的影响。本文还讨论了税收(避税)因素和自然资源因素的作用,以及它们与制度因素的交互作用。本文的研究发现,总体而言,与大部分跨国公司不同的是:中国的ODI不太关心对方国家(或地区)的政治制度(话语权与问责制)和政治稳定度,而更关心政府效率、监管质量和腐败控制,并倾向于避开法律体系严格的国家;同时,中国的ODI存在明显的避税和获取资源的动机;东道国的制度质量与避税功能之间存在替代关系。本文的研究有助于理解中国和新兴市场经济体的ODI的决定因素和国际间资本流动的规律。 China has become the third largest source of outward direct investment ( ODI). This paper studies how institutions in the host countries affect the location choices of China's ODI. Based on a deal-level sample from 2002--2011, this paper empirically tests how political institutions, political stability, government effectiveness, regulatory quality, rule of law and corruption control in the host countries affect the location choices of China's ODI. On top of these institutional factors, we study the effects of tax evasion and natural resources in host countries, and their interactions with the institutional factors. We find that political institutions in the host countries are not major concerns of the ODI, while government effectiveness, regulatory quality, and corruption control have significant effects on the locations of ODI. And China's ODI tend to avoid countries with strict legal system. Tax evasion and resources are also major motives of China's ODI. General institutional quality and tax evasion are substitutes in China's ODI location decisions.
出处 《经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第12期126-142,共17页 Economic Research Journal
基金 教育部"新世纪优秀人才支持计划" 复旦大学"985中国经济国际竞争力创新基地项目" 复旦大学"985工程三期整体推进社会科学研究项目" "上海市重点学科建设项目"(编号B101) 上海"浦江人才"(2011) 上海高校智库(复旦大学中国经济研究中心)的资助 复旦大学"当代中国经济与社会工作室"的研究成果
关键词 中国 ODI 制度 税收 资源 China ODI Institutions Tax Resources
  • 相关文献

参考文献40

  • 1高凌云,王洛林.进口贸易与工业行业全要素生产率[J].经济学(季刊),2010,9(1):391-414. 被引量:101
  • 2谢丹阳、姜波,2012:《中美对外直接投资表现对比》,《金融时报》1月20日.
  • 3Aleksynska,M.,and O. Havrylchyk, 2012, “ FDI from the South: The Role of Institutional Distance and Natural Resources”,European Journal of Political Economy, 29,38-53.
  • 4Amit, R.,and P. J. Schoemaker,1993 , “Strategic Assets and Organizational Rent”,Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33-46.
  • 5Andersson, T. , and R. Swensson, 1996 , “Entry Modes for Direct Investment Determined by the Composition of Firm-specific Skills", Scandinavian Journal of Economics,96(4) , 551-560.
  • 6Boddewyn, J. J.,and T. L. Brewer, 1994,“ International-business Political Behavior: New Theoretical Directions”,Academy of Management Review , 19(1), 119-143.
  • 7Buckley, P. J.,J. Clegg, A. R. Cross, X. Liu, H. Voss, and P. Zheng, 2007, “The Determinants of Chinese Outward Foreign Direct Investment”,Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4),499-518.
  • 8Busse, M.,and C. Hefeker, 2007,“Political Risk, Institutions and Foreign Direct Investment”,European Journal of Political Economy,23(2) , 397-415.
  • 9Caves, R. E.,1996 , Multinational Enterprise and Economic Analysis, Cambridge University Press.
  • 10Cheung, Yin-Wong, and Xingwang Qian, 2009,“Empirics of China’s Outward Direct Investment”,Pacific Economic Review, 14(3), 321-341.

二级参考文献44

共引文献100

引证文献425

二级引证文献3416

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部