期刊文献+

微创Quadrant通道下椎间融合术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的初步疗效 被引量:5

Preliminary outcome of intervertebral fusion under Quadrant minimally invasive system for treatment of recurrent intervertebral lumbar disc herniation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价腰椎后路微创Quadrant通道下椎间融合术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症的初步临床疗效。方法 2010年1月-2012年12月,我科收治25例复发性腰椎间盘突出症患者,采用后路原切口双侧肌间隙入路(Wiltse入路),经微创Quadrant通道下行椎间融合术。应用Oswestry功能障碍指数(ODI)及疼痛视觉类比评分(VAS)对患者再次手术前、手术后进行临床疗效评价,腰椎薄层CT扫描及三维重建评估椎体间融合。结果 25例患者均获得随访,随访的时间为12-36个月,平均19.2个月。术前VAS平均评分为8.26±1.4分,术后末次随访VAS平均评分为2.47±0.65分,与术前比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。ODI评分术前平均40.32±3.14分,术后末次随访平均为6.67±2.54分,与术前比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。末次随访椎体间植骨均融合,无椎弓根螺钉断裂和融合器移位。结论微创Quadrant通道下椎间融合术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症安全有效。 Objective To evaluate preliminary clinical efficacy of minimally invasive posterior lumbar spine interbody fusion under Quadrant system for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Methods From January 2010 to December 2012,a total of 25 cases with recurrent lumbar disc herniation were implemented surgery. The patients underwent interbody fusion via bilateral paramedian approach under Quadrant invasive system. ODI and VAS score were used to evaluate the pre-and post-revision operation outcome. Lumbar CT scan and three-dimensional reconstruction were used to assess the lumbar interbody fusion. Results Twenty five patients were followed up for 12-36 months(mean,19.2 months). The VAS score at preoperation was 8.26 ±1.4, and 2.47 ±0.65 at last follow-up after operation, which showed statistical significance(P〈0.05). ODI score preoperative and the last followup after operation were 40.32+3.14 and 6.67±2.54(P〈0.05), respectively. All cases got bony fusion in the last follow-up after operation. No breakage of pedicle screws or fusion device shift was noted.Conclusions It is safe and effective by using the Quadrant minimally invasive system for lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of recurrent lumbar disc herniation.
机构地区 梅州市人民医院
出处 《岭南现代临床外科》 2014年第6期675-678,共4页 Lingnan Modern Clinics in Surgery
基金 广东省梅州市科技计划项目(编号:2014B96)
关键词 腰椎间盘突出症 复发性 QUADRANT通道 Lumbar disc herniation Recurrent Quadrant system
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Zaveri GR, Mehta SS. Surgical treatment of lumbartuberculous, spondylodiscitis by transforaminal lumbar interbodyfusion (TLIF)and posterior instrumentation[J]. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2009, 22(4): 257-262.
  • 2Pitkanen MT, Manninen HI, Lindgren KA. Segmental lumbar spine instability at flexionexten sion radiography can be predicted by conventional radiography. [J] Clin Radiol, 2002, 57(7): 632-639.
  • 3Myles PS, Troedel S, Boquest M, et al. The pain visual analog scale: is it linear or nonlinear [J]. Anesth Analg, 1999, 89(6): 1517-1520.
  • 4Lue YJ, Hsieh CL, Huang MH, et al. Development of a Chinese version of the Oswestry Disa bility Index version 2.1 [J]. Spine, 2008, 33(21): 2354-2360.
  • 5Suk KS, Lee HM, Kim NH, et al. Unilateral versus bilateralpedicle screw fixation in lumbar spinal fusion [J]. Spine, 2000, 25(14): 1843-1847.
  • 6王洪伟,李长青,周跃.复发性腰椎间盘突出症及其手术治疗进展[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2011,21(8):691-694. 被引量:23
  • 7Meredith DS, Huang RC, Nguyen J, et al. Ohesity increases the risk of recurrent herniated nucIons pulposus after lumbar micrediscectomy[J]. Spine J, 2010, 10(7): 575-580.
  • 8Kim JM, Lee SH, Ahn Y, et al. Reonrrenee after suecessful percutanoous endoscopic lumbar discectomy[J]. Minim Invasive eurosurg, 2007, 50(2): 82-85.
  • 9Suk KS, Lee HM, Moon SH, et al. Recurrent lumbar disc henriation: results of operative management[J]. Spine, 2001, 26(6) : 672-676.
  • 10王光林,孙兆忠,胡鹏.腰椎间盘突出症术后复发再次椎板间开窗手术治疗体会[J].颈腰痛杂志,2014,35(1):41-44. 被引量:6

二级参考文献67

  • 1申勇,杨大龙,张英泽,丁文元,董玉昌,杜浩.复发性腰椎间盘突出症的再手术治疗[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(4):255-258. 被引量:33
  • 2邓树才,董荣华,赵合元,周静.腰椎间盘突出症手术失败原因和再手术方法的探讨[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(2):90-95. 被引量:32
  • 3陈志明,赵杰,连小峰,袁建东,马辉,李忠海,金根洋.复发性腰椎间盘突出症的影像学分析及临床意义[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(1):12-15. 被引量:21
  • 4王建,周跃,初同伟,王卫东,张正丰,李长青.显微内窥镜下椎间盘切除术治疗复发性腰椎间盘突出症[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(5):350-353. 被引量:11
  • 5Carragee EJ, Spinnikie AO, Alamin TF, et al. A prospective controlled study of limited versus subtotal posterior discectomy" short-term out-comes in patients with herniated lumbar intervertebral discs and large posterior anular defect. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2006, 31(6): 653-657.
  • 6Carragee EJ, Han MY, Suen PW, et al. Clinical outcomes after discectomy for sciatica: the effects of fragment type and anttlar competence. J Bone Joint Surg (Am), 2003, 85(1): 102-108.
  • 7Kim MS, Park KW, Hwang C, et al. Recurrence rate of lumbar disc herniation after open discectomy in active young men. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 34(1): 24-29.
  • 8Johnsson R. Surgical treatment of symptomatic recurrent disc herniation// Herkowitz HN, Dvorak J, Bell G, et al. The Lumbar Spine. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2005: 867.
  • 9Osterman H, Sund R, Seitsalo S, et al. Risk of multiple reoperations after lumbar discectomy: a population-based study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2003, 28(6): 621-627.
  • 10Connolly ES. Surgery for recurrent lumbar disc herniation. Clin Neurosurg, 1992, 39: 211-216.

共引文献36

同被引文献43

引证文献5

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部