期刊文献+

微气泡曝气对生物膜反应器启动运行性能影响 被引量:7

Influence of microbubble aeration on start-up and performance of a biofilm reactor
下载PDF
导出
摘要 比较了微气泡曝气(MB)与传统气泡曝气(CB)流化床生物膜反应器启动运行性能,以及生物膜形成过程与组成特性.结果表明,启动运行中,MB反应器的COD、NH4+-N和TN平均去除率分别达到90.3%、92.7%和43.4%,而CB反应器的COD、NH4+-N和TN平均去除率分别为79.4%、86.3%和29.3%,MB反应器污染物去除性能优于CB反应器.同时,MB反应器的氧利用率高达94.3%,显著高于CB反应器.MB反应器中生物膜形成速率和稳定生物膜生物量均高于CB反应器,并且所形成的生物膜VSS/SS比值较高而EPS含量较低.因此,微气泡曝气能够加速生物膜形成并获得更高的活性生物量,从而提高生物膜反应器的启动运行性能. Two fluidized biofilm reactors with microbubble aeration (MB) and conventional bubble aeration (CB) were operated simultaneously to compare their performances during start-up and stable operation. The biofilm formation and composition in both reactors were also investigated. The results showed the average removal efficiencies of COD, NH4+-N and TN were 90.3%, 92.7% and 43.4% in MB reactor during start-up and stable operation, respectively. The corresponding removal efficiencies in CB reactor were 79.4%, 86.3%and 29.3%, respectively. MB reactor presented more efficient performance of contaminant removal than CB reactor. In addition, the oxygen utilization efficiency in MB reactor reached 94.3%, which was much higher than that in CB reactor. Faster biofilm formation and larger biofilm biomass were achieved in MB reactor, compared with CB reactor. Moreover, the biofilm formed in MB reactor showed higher VSS/SS ratio and lower EPS content. These results demonstrated that biofilm formation was enhanced by microbubble aeration in MB reactor, which contained more active biomass.
出处 《中国环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第12期3093-3098,共6页 China Environmental Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(51008111) 河北省应用基础研究计划重点基础研究项目(11966726D)
关键词 微气泡曝气 生物膜反应器 启动运行 生物膜形成 胞外聚合物(EPS) microbubble aeration biofilm reactor start-up biofilm formation extracelluler substances (EPS)
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1于英翠,高大文,陶彧,陈春宏.利用序批式生物膜反应器启动厌氧氨氧化研究[J].中国环境科学,2012,32(5):843-849. 被引量:45
  • 2Lazaroval V, Manem J. An innovative process for waste water treatment:the circulating floating bed reactor [J]. Water Science and Technology, 1996,34(9):89-99.
  • 3甘露,阎宁,张永明.紫外辐射与生物膜同步耦合降解喹啉[J].中国环境科学,2012,32(4):623-629. 被引量:5
  • 4Andreottola G, Foladori P, Ragazzi M, etal. Experimental comparison between MBBR and activated sludge system for the treatment of municipal wastewater [J]. Water Science and Technology, 2000,41(4):375-382.
  • 5Guo W, Ngo H H, Dharmawan F, et al. Roles of polyurethane foam in aerobic moving and fixed bed bioreactors [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2010, 101 (5): 1435-1439.
  • 6Ferral M, Guglielmi G, Andreottola G. Modelling respirometric tests for the assessment of kinetic and stoichiometric parameters on MBBR biofilm for municipal wastewater treatment [J]. Environmental Modelling and Software, 2010,25(5):626-632.
  • 7Gonzale O, Esplugas M, Sans C, et al. Performance of a Sequencing Batch Biofilm Reactor for the treatment of pre- oxidized Sulfamethoxazole solutions [J]. Water Research, 2009, 43(8):2149-2158.
  • 8Lazaroval V, Manem J. Biofilm characterization and activity analysis in water and wastewater treatment [J]. Water Research, 1995,29(10):2227-2245.
  • 9Lopesl F A, Vieira M J, Melo L F. Chemical composition and activity of a biofilm during the start-up of an airlift reactor [J]. Water Science and Technology, 2000,41(4/5):105-111.
  • 10Paul E, Ochoaj C, Pechaud Y, et al. Effect of shear stress and growth conditions on detachment and physical properties of hiofilms [J]. Water Research, 2012,46(17):5499-5508.

二级参考文献71

共引文献108

同被引文献93

引证文献7

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部