摘要
《文选》为我国现存编纂最早之文学总集,胡刻本《文选》则为今人刻文选之依据,《文选》乐府古辞三首亦多次编选入中小学阅读课本,影响日趋广泛。胡刻本虽在尤刻本基础上更为完善,亦无法避免新的错误。笔者众本对校、他校,认为著者记载的差异肇于《文选》与《玉台新咏》记载之异,发现乐府古辞三首有异文共二十五处,兹逐一列出,以供参考。
Among all the collected works of ancient Chinese literature, Analects was the earliest compiled one, and modern sculptures of ancient Chinese literature were based on the version of Hu Kejia’ s.Three ancient Yue Fu poems from Analects were edited to textbooks of junior schools so that the impact of Analects has becoming more and more significant nowadays.Hu Kejia’ s version, though more accurate than the version of You Mao’ s, born new mistakes unavoidably.By comparing the version of Hu Kejia’ s with other versions, it was found that the mistakes were due to the differences between Analects and another literature selection Yu Tai Xin Yong.25 flaws found in the three pieces of Yue Fu poems were listed in this paper for reference.
出处
《宜宾学院学报》
2014年第10期34-38,共5页
Journal of Yibin University
关键词
《文选》
胡刻本
乐府诗
作者
校勘
Analects
the version of Hu Kejia’ s
Yue Fu poems
author
check