期刊文献+

考虑非期望产出的两阶段生产过程全要素生产率评价研究 被引量:9

Total Factor Productivity Evaluation of Two-stage Process Based on the Undesirable Outputs
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决两阶段生产过程中存在的非期望最终产出问题,将方向性距离函数(DDF)拓展到传统两阶段DEA模型中,构建两阶段投入产出导向的Malmquist-Luenberger指数模型。结果表明,系统整体生产率变动是各阶段综合作用的结果。与"黑箱"Malmquist-Luenberger指数相比,新建模型能更合理、更贴近实际地评价生产率变化。通过各阶段技术进步指数和技术效率指数的变化分析,可帮助决策者深入探究整体生产率变化的原因,明确改进提升的方向。算例研究证实该方法的合理优越性。 According to the undesirable outputs generated in the two - stage production process, we extend the directional distance function to the model of traditional two - stage DEA, and propose the two - stage DDF - DEA model. On the basis of the new model, the paper constructs two - stage input and output - oriented Malmquist - Luenberger productivity index. The results illustrates that the changes of DMU' s overall total factor productivity (TFP) is the comprehensive effect results of every stage' s TFP changes. Compared with the single process of Malmquist - Luenberger index, the new index model can evaluate period efficiency changes more reasonably, and more close to the reality. By analyzing the changes of each stage' s technological progress index and technical efficiency index, it can help decision makers to further explore the changes reason of total factor productivity, so as to clear the direction of improvement and promotion. The numerical example approves the rationality and superiority of our method.
出处 《科技管理研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第24期218-223,共6页 Science and Technology Management Research
基金 国家自然科学基金项目"减量化与低碳双重约束下我国高能耗制造企业技术效率评价与提升研究"(71272160) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目"循环经济减量化原则下我国制造企业效率评价理论与方法及其在钢铁产业中的应用"(FRF-TP-09-022A) 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划项目"循环经济与低碳约束下我国高能耗制造业效率优化研究"(NCET-12-0772)
关键词 非期望产出 Malmquist-Luenberger指数 两阶段生产过程 全要素生产率 the undesirable outputs malmquist- luenberger index two -stage process total factor productivity
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1李晓亚,崔晋川.基于DEA方法的额外资源分配算法[J].系统工程学报,2007,22(1):57-61. 被引量:19
  • 2迟国泰,孙秀峰,郑杏果.中国商业银行收入结构与收入效率关系研究[J].系统工程学报,2006,21(6):574-582. 被引量:51
  • 3SHEPHARD R W, FARE R. A dynamic theory of production corre- spondences ORC 75 - 13 [ R]. Operations Research Centers, Berk- ley: University of California, 1975.
  • 4FARE R, GROSSKOPF S. Intertemporal production Frontiers: with Dynamic DEA[ M]. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1996.
  • 5FARE R, GROSSKOPF S. Network DEA [ J ]. Socio - Economic Planning Sciences, 2000 (34) : 35 -49.
  • 6WANG C H, GOPAL R, ZIONTS S. Use of data envelopment analysis in assessing information technology impact on firm performance [ J ]. Annals of operations Research , 1997 (73) : 191 -213.
  • 7SEXTON T R, LEWIS H F. Two - stage DEA : an application to major league baseball [ J]. Journal of productivity analysis, 2003, 19 ( 2/ 3 ) : 227 - 49.
  • 8CHEN Y, HANG L, YANG F, et al. Evaluation of information tech- nology investment: A data envelopment analysis approach [ J]. Com- puters & Operations research, 2006 (33) : 1368 -1379.
  • 9毕功兵,梁樑,杨锋.两阶段生产系统的DEA效率评价模型[J].中国管理科学,2007,15(2):92-96. 被引量:82
  • 10毕功兵,梁樑,杨锋.资源约束型两阶段生产系统的DEA效率评价模型[J].中国管理科学,2009,17(2):71-75. 被引量:31

二级参考文献41

共引文献170

同被引文献127

引证文献9

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部