期刊文献+

TEM技术在大牛地气田管道腐蚀评价中的应用 被引量:1

Application of TEM Technology in Daniudi Gas Field Evaluation of Pipeline Corrosion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文中结合大牛地气田埋地管道腐蚀直接评价(ECDA,ICDA)实践,应用管道壁厚瞬变电磁(TEM)检测技术,通过在沿管道按一定间距布置测点进行基础检测,对所发现的管壁厚度异常点处再加密检测,从而确定腐蚀严重部位,较快地掌握气田整体管道质量情况,达到不需开挖、不破坏管道的良好检测效果。 In this paper, the Daniudi gas field of buried pipeline corrosion direct assessment (ECDA, ICDA) was combined to evaluate practiee and pipe wall thickness of transient electromagnetic (TEM) detection technology was applied. Basic detection was carried out by spacing measuring points along the pipe. The pipe wall thickness of the abnormal point was detected intensively so as to determine the most serious corrosion position and quickly grasp the quality of the whole pipeline in gas field, thus making the detection without digging and damaging the pipeline.
作者 郭勇
出处 《管道技术与设备》 CAS 2014年第6期43-46,共4页 Pipeline Technique and Equipment
基金 国家科技重大专项(2010ZX05045)
关键词 管道腐蚀评价 TEM技术 腐蚀检测 大牛地气田 pipeline corrosion assessment TEM technology corrosion detection Daniudi gas field
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献8

  • 1石仁委.埋地管道腐蚀检测技术的探讨[J].石油工程建设,2006,32(2):30-31. 被引量:18
  • 2李永年等,TEM法管道腐蚀检测中的几个问题[A],2000国际表面工程与防腐蚀技术研讨会-21世纪表面工程与防腐蚀技术的发展与应用论文集[C],2000,420-424.
  • 3李永年,瞬变电磁(TEM)检测方法[A],张清玉主编,油气田工程实用防腐蚀技术,北京:中国石化出版社,2009,577-583.
  • 4李永年等,用脉冲瞬变法检测埋地金属管道腐蚀程度[A],2000国际表面工程与防腐蚀技术研讨会--21世纪表面工程与防腐蚀技术的发展与应用论文集[C],2000,425-429.
  • 5李永年,瞬变电磁(TEM)检测方法,张清玉主编,油气田工程实用防腐蚀技术,北京:中国石化出版社,2009年.
  • 6李吉松,《利用正、余弦变换实现频率域正演到时间域的转换》,勘察地球物理勘察地球化学文集(第20集),地质出版社.1996年.
  • 7《瞬变电磁测深译文集》[J].中南矿业学院学报,1985,.
  • 8A·Б·维利金Г·C·弗兰托夫著谢学融译《感应电法勘探中的电磁场》,中国工业出版社,1965年.

共引文献19

同被引文献25

  • 1赵新伟,李鹤林,罗金恒,霍春勇,冯耀荣.油气管道完整性管理技术及其进展[J].中国安全科学学报,2006,16(1):129-135. 被引量:98
  • 2Restrepo C E, Simonoff J S, Zimmerman R. Causes, cost consequences, and risk implications of accidents in US hazardous liquid pipeline infrastructure[J]. International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, 2009, 2(1): 38-50.
  • 3Jamshidi A, Yazdani-Chamzini A, Yakhchali S H, et al. Developing a new fuzzy inference system for pipeline risk assessment[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(1): 197-208.
  • 4Shahriar A, Sadiq R, Tesfamariam S. Risk analysis for oil & gas pipelines: A sustainability assessment approach using fuzzy based bow-tie analysis[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2012, 25(3): 505-523.
  • 5Ma L, Li Y, Liang L, et al. A novel method of quantitative risk assessment based on grid difference of pipeline sections[J]. Safety Science, 2013, 59: 219-226.
  • 6Ma L, Cheng L, Li M. Quantitative risk analysis of urban natural gas pipeline networks using geographical information systems[J]. Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries, 2013, 26(6):1183-1192.
  • 7Netto T A, Honorato H J, Qassim R Y. Prioritization of failure risk in subsea flexible pipes via data envelopment analysis[J]. Marine Structures, 2013, 34:105-116.
  • 8Gomes W J S, Beck A T, Haukaas T. Optimal inspection planning for onshore pipelines subject to external corrosion[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2013, 118:18-27.
  • 9Samimi A. Causes of Increased Corrosion in Oil and Gas Pipelines in the Middle East[J]. International Journal of Basic and Applied science, Indonesia, 2012: 572-577.
  • 10Cole I S, Marney D. The science of pipe corrosion: A review of the literature on the corrosion of ferrous metals in soils[J]. Corrosion science, 2012, 56: 5-16.

引证文献1

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部