期刊文献+

二维和三维腔内超声技术应用于肛瘘诊断的比较研究 被引量:9

Comparison of two-dimensional ultrasound and three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound in the diagnosis of perianal fistula
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评估二维和三维腔内超声技术诊断肛瘘的准确性。方法收集2012年1—12月南京市中医院肛肠科住院接受手术治疗的47例肛瘘患者临床影像资料。以术中探查结果为金标准,对二维和三维两种腔内超声检查的诊断结果进行kappa一致性检验。结果二维和三维腔内超声对瘘管内口的诊断均表现出与术中探查结果较好的一致性(kappa系数0.776比0.636);三维腔内超声对括约肌间瘘、高位经括约肌瘘和括约肌上瘘的诊断与术中探查结果的一致性均极好,并优于二维超声,kappa系数分别为0.810比0.592,0.863比0.548,1.000比0.672;对于分支瘘管的诊断,三维超声也优于二维超声(kappa系数分别为0.659比0.535);对于合并脓肿的诊断,三维和二维超声一致性均极好(kappa系数:0.881比0.816)。结论三维腔内超声能清晰显示瘘管与括约肌的关系,尤其对高位、合并分支瘘管的复杂性肛瘘,较二维超声的诊断准确性更高。 Objective To compare the accuracy of two-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (2D-EAUS) and three-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3D-EAUS) in the diagnosis of perianal fistulas. Methods Image data of 47 perianal fistula patients undergoing surgery in our department between January 2012 and December 2012 were collected. All the patients underwent 2D-EAUS and 3D-EAUS , and the results were compared to intraoperative findings (gold standard) by kappa concordance test. Results Both 2D-EAUS and 3D-EAUS showed good concordance with intraoperative findings in internal opening (kappa: 0.776 vs. 0.636). 3D-EAUS had better concordance with intraoperative finding in the diagnosis of intersphincteric , high transsphincteric and suprasphincteric fistulas as compared to 2D-EAUS (kappa: 0.810 vs. 0.592, kappa: 0.863 vs. 0.548, kappa: 1.000 vs. 0.672). 3D-EAUS showed better concordance with intraoperative findings in secondary tract compared to 2D-EAUS (kappa: 0.659 vs. 0.535). Both 2D-EAUS and 3D-EAUS had good concordance with intraoperative findings in complicated abscesses (kappa: 0.881 vs. 0.816). Conclusion 3D-EAUS can show the relationship of fistula with anal sphincter , especially in diagnosing high fistula and fistula with secondary tracts, and has a higher diagnostic accuracy than 2D-EAUS.
出处 《中华胃肠外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 2014年第12期1187-1189,共3页 Chinese Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
关键词 腔内超声 肛瘘 诊断 Endoanal ultrasound Perianal fistula Diagnsis
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Gravante G, Giordano P. The role of three-dimensionalendoluminal ultrasound imaging in the valuation of anorectaldiseases: a review[J]. Surg Endosc, 2008,22: 1570-1578.
  • 2李涛,丁克,王建新,吕艳锋,赵志伦,贝绍生,禹化龙.三维肛管直肠腔内超声在肛瘘诊治中的应用[J].中华外科杂志,2010,48(16):1210-1213. 被引量:21
  • 3Garc6s Albir M, Garcia Botello S,Escldpez Valero P, et al.Evaluation of three-dimensional endoanal endosonography ofperianal fistulas and correlation with surgical findings [J]. CirEsp,2010,87:299-305.
  • 4Sudot-Szopinskal I,Gessla J, Jakubowski W, et al. Reliabilityof endosonography in evaluation of anal fistulae and abscesses[J]. Acta Radiol, 2002,43:599-602.
  • 5Toyonaga T,Tanaka Y, Song JF, et al. Comparison ofaccuracy of physical examination and endoanal ultrasonographyfor preoperative assessment in patients with acute and chronicanal fistula[J]. Tech Coloproctol, 2008,12:217-223.
  • 6Ratto C, Grillo E, Parello A, et al. Endoanal ultrasound-guidedsurgery for anal fistula[J]. Endoscopy, 2005,37:722-728.
  • 7Santoro GA, Fortling B. The advantages of volumen rendeningin three-dimensional endosonography of the anorectum [J]. DisColon Rectum, 2007,50:359-368.
  • 8Subasinghe D, Samarasekera DN. Comparison of preoperativeendoanal ultrasonography with intraoperative findings for fistulain ano[J]. World J Surg, 2010,34: 1123-1127.

二级参考文献3

  • 1Cho DY.Endosonographic criteria for an internal opening of fistulain-ano.Dis Colon Rectum,1999,42:515-518.
  • 2Seow-Choen F,Burnett S,Bartran CI,et al.Comparison between anal endosonography and digital examination in the evaluation ofanal fistulae.Br J Surg,1991,78:445-447.
  • 3杜联芳,杨梦玲,王泽.高频超声诊断肛周脓肿的价值[J].中华超声影像学杂志,2003,12(1):56-56. 被引量:42

共引文献20

同被引文献73

  • 1潘兆春,陈邑岐,钱海华,何雯玉,陈玉根,黄继承,曾莉.高位肛瘘术前MRI与临床诊断的比较分析[J].中国临床医学影像杂志,2010,21(11):814-816. 被引量:10
  • 2Siddiqui MR, Ashrafian H, Tozer P, et al. A diagnostic accuracy recta-analysis of endoanal ultrasound and MRI for periansl fistula assessment [J].Dis Colon Rectum,2012,55(5) : 576-585.
  • 3Steele SR, Kumar R, Feingold DL, et al. Practice parameters for the management of perianal abscess and fistula-in-ano [J].Dis Colon Rectum,2011,54(12) : 1465-1474.
  • 4Isbert C, Germer CT. Impact of endoscopy and endosonography on local staging of rectal carcinoma [J].Chirurg, 2012,83 (5) 430-438.
  • 5Tilney HS, Heriot AG, Trickett JP, et al. The use of intra- operative endo-anal ultrasound in perianal disease[J].Coloreetal I3is,2006,8(4) :338-341.
  • 6Ratto C, Grillo E, Parello A, et al. Endoanal ultrasound-guided surgery for anal fistula [J].Endoscopy,2005,37(8) :722-728.
  • 7Santoro GA, Fortling B. The advantages of volume rendering in three-dimensional endosonography of the anorectum [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2007,50(3) : 359-368.
  • 8Gttgens KW, Smeets RR, Stassen LP, et al. Systematic review and rneta-analysis of surgical interventions for high cryptoglandular peri- analfistula[ J]. Int J Colorectal Dis,2015,30(5 ) :583-593.
  • 9Limura E, Giordano P. Modem management of anal fistula[ J]. World J Gastroenterol,2015,21 ( 1 ) :12-20.
  • 10Cintron JR,Abcarian H, Chaudhry V, et al. Treatment of fistula-in-ano using a porcine small intestinal suhmucosa anal fistula plug[J ]. Tech Coloproctol,2013,17(2) :187-191.

引证文献9

二级引证文献43

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部