期刊文献+

理解自由现金流代理问题的显示性偏好方法研究 被引量:1

A Revealed Preference Approach to Understanding Free Cash Flow Agency Problem
原文传递
导出
摘要 与投资现金流敏感性等常用指标不同,管理层期望回报率与股东期望回报率的偏离程度是评价自由现金流代理问题严重程度的直接指标。但该指标难以观测,为此Robert和Huntley^([1])通过构建结构化方程,提出根据公司的投资支出估算上述指标的方法,并称之为显示性偏好方法.针对Robert和Huntley^([1])的结构化方程忽略公司融资决策信息的缺点,推导同时包含投资支出、融资成本、融资规模(可观测变量)和管理层期望回报率与股东期望回报率偏离程度(待估参数)的新的结构化方程,并应用J统计量和多组研究样本对新方程的有效性加以验证,同时与原方程比较。最后以过度投资为例说明管理层期望回报率与股东期望回报率偏离程度估计结果的应用价值。 Difference between manager's discount rate and shareholder's discount rate is accepted as a direct index of the severity of free cash flow agency problem. Robert and Huntley constructed a structural equation to estimate this index by using investment expenditure data, which is called revealed preference approach. Firstly, we improve Robert and Huntley's approach by combining information on cost of financing and scale of financing. Secondly we test the effectiveness of the improved approach by using J statistics and several research samples manager's discount rate and shareholder's At last, we show the application value of difference between discount rate.
作者 刘烨 张金清
出处 《数理统计与管理》 CSSCI 北大核心 2014年第6期1113-1121,共9页 Journal of Applied Statistics and Management
基金 国家自然科学基金(项目批准号:71203091) 国家自然科学基金(项目批准号:71073025) 江苏省教育厅指导项目 南京大学苗圃项目
关键词 自由现金流 代理理论 显示性偏好 过度投资 free cash flow, agency theory, revealed preference, overinvestment
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Robert S C, Huntley S. A revealed preference approach to understanding corporate governance problems: Evidence from Canada [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 2004, 74(1): 181 206.
  • 2Jensen M C. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers [J]. American Economic Review, 1986, 76(2): 654 665.
  • 3Stein J C. Rational capital budgeting in an irrational world [J]. Journal of Business, 1996, 69(4): 429 455.
  • 4Dow J, Gorton G. Stock market efficiency and economic efficiency: Is there a connection? [J]. Journal of Finance, 1997, 52(3): 1087-1130.
  • 5Ferdinand A G. Free cash flow, debt-monitoring and managers' LIFO/FIFO policy choice [J]. Journal of Corporate Finance, 2001, 7(4): 475-492.
  • 6Lang H P, Stulz R, Walkling R A. Test of free cash flow hypothesis: The e:se of bidder returns [J]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1991, 29(2): 315-335.
  • 7Ferdinand A G, Judy S, Tsui L. A test of the free cash flow and debt monitoring hypotheses: Evidence from audit pricing [J]. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1997, 24(2): 219 237.
  • 8Zhang Y. Are debt and incentive compensation substitutes in controlling the free cash flow agency problem [J]. Financial Management, 2009, 38(3): 507-541.
  • 9Paul A G, David H L, Yuan S. Agency problems and audit fees: Further tests of the free cash flow hypothesis [J]. Accounting & Finance, 2010, 50(2): 321 350.
  • 10周明,李宗植,李军山.过度投资与其制约因素的实证分析——以制造业上市公司为例[J].数理统计与管理,2009,28(4):691-695. 被引量:6

二级参考文献117

同被引文献44

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部