我国行政程序法治化之反思

Reflection on Legalization of China's Administrative Procedure

我国行政程序法治化虽然取得了显著进步,但从比较行政程序法视角和行政程序法在我国行政法治建设中发挥的实际功能与其应有的功能关系之视角这两方面来看,仍然需要对其进行反思。借助马克思·韦伯所倡导的类型分析法为工具,以行政程序法所调整的行政活动类型以及行政主体在该活动中的程序角色为基点,选择行政决定、行政法规、行政规定为变项,可以将我国行政程序法建构成司法模式、立法模式和行政模式的行政程序法。而对我国行政程序法反思之重点就可以借助于司法模式的行政程序法、立法模式的行政程序法和行政模式的行政程序法的分析框架来进行。

The legalization of the administrative procedure had improved in the past twenty years. However, the comparison between the practical function and the expected function of Administrative Procedure Act＇ s leads to a reason to believe that a reflection on the legalization is essential. Analytic tool and framework are needed in order to effectively reflect on the legalization of the administrative procedure. Judicial form, legislation form, and executive form of Administrative Procedure Act are analyzed by the category analysis method that was advocated by Max We- ber. The three forms are based on the administration regulated activity and the role of administrative subject played in the activity. Administrative decisions, laws and regulations, and provisions are variables that also make up the ju- dicial form, legislation form, and executive form of Administrative Procedure Act.