运动员心智游移认知结构模型研究——基于探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析的方法被引量：2

A Cognitive Structure Model Study on Mind Wandering of Athletes——Based on Exploratory as well as Confirmatory Factor Analysis

下载PDF

导出

摘要采用自编的《运动员心智游移认知结构问卷》,运用问卷法、探索性因素分析和验证性因素分析等方法,构建并验证了三个初阶因子的运动员心智游移认知结构模型。研究表明:运动员心智游移因素具有可靠性和有效性,其基本结构由任务、环境和情绪等三个因子构成。研究为运动队评估运动员心智游移认知取向提供理论依据和实证工具。 Based on a questionnaire survey as wel1 as EFA and CFA,a cognitive structural model has been developed to investigate mind wandering of athletes.The mode1 reveals the typica1 phases and factors of mind wandering. The study shows that the effective and reliable cognitive structure of mind wandering consist of three dimensions,namely,task,environment and emotion.The mode1 may be used as a theoretical basis and empirical tool for sports teams to evaluate cognitive orientation of athletes.

作者孙福成陈欣李波马玉芳

机构地区南京农业大学体育部南京大学体育科学研究所南京工业大学体育部

出处《四川体育科学》 2014年第6期33-35,78,共4页 Sichuan Sports Science

基金国家体育总局课题(项目编号:1882SS13043) 南京农业大学中央高校基本科研业务费人文社科基金(项目编号:SK2014022)

关键词运动员心智游移结构模型探索性因素分析验证性因素分析 STRUCTURE mode1 Athletes Mind wandering EFA CFA

分类号 G804.82 [文化科学—运动人体科学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献7

1Smallwood J- Schooler JW. The RestlessPsychologicalBulletin, 006,132: 946-958.
2Smallwood J, Fishman D J and Schooler J W. Counting the Cost ofan Absent Mind:Mind wandering as an underrecognized influence oneducational performance[J]. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 2007,14: 230-236.
3Baars B J. Spontaneous repetitive thoughts can be adaptive:Postscript on mind wandering[J]. Psychological Bulletin, 2010, 136:208-210.
4胡楠荼,许百华.心智游移的研究:理论、方法及进展[J].应用心理学,2012,18(1):40-49. 被引量：13
5王寅谊,宋晓兰.心智游移及其相关现象的测量[J].浙江外国语学院学报,2011(2):101-108. 被引量：7
6Raichle M E. The brain’s daik energy [J]. Science, 2006, 314(5803): 1249-1250.
7孙福成,李阿特.大学生体育学习风格测评模型的研制[J].体育学刊,2014,21(1):77-81. 被引量：1

二级参考文献112

1谭顶良.学习风格的要素及其测定[J].教育理论与实践,1993,13(1):55-62. 被引量：16
2Antrobus, J. S., Singer, J. L., & Greenberg, S. ( 1966). Studies in the stream of consciousness: Ex- perimental suppression of spontaneous cognitive pro- cesses. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 23 ( 2 ), 399 - 417.
3Baars, B. J. ( 1988 ). A cognitive theory of conscious- ness. Cambridge, England : Cambridge University PI"-SS.
4Bargh,J.A. ( 1997). The automatieity of everyday life. In R. S. W. Jr. ( Ed. ), The automaticity of everyday life: Advances in social cognition (Vol. 10, pp. 1 61 ) . Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaurn Associates.
5Binder, J. R., Frost, J. A., Hammeke, T. A., Bellgo- wan,P. S. 17. , Rao, S. M. , & Cox, R. W. (1999).
6Conceptual processing during the conscious resting state: A functional MRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11 ( 1 ), 80 - 93.
7Braboszcz, C., & Delorme, A. (2010). Lost in thoughts: Neural markers of low alertness during mind wandering. Neuroimage, 54(4), 3040 - 3047.
8Buckner, R. L. , Andrews- Hanna, J. R. , & Schacter, D. L. ( 2008). The brain' s default network : Anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. New York Acade- my Sciences Annals, 1124, 1 - 38.
9Buckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. ( 2007 ). Self-projec- tion and the brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(2),49 - 57.
10Buckner, R. L. , & Vincent, J. L. (2007). Unrest at rest: Default activity and spontaneous network corre- lations. Neuroimage, 37(4), 1091 - 1096.