期刊文献+

应用磁共振扩散张量成像评价肾移植术后早期移植肾功能的研究 被引量:3

Evaluation of kidney transplant function early after transplantation with magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨磁共振(MR)扩散张量成像(DTI)评价肾移植术后早期移植肾功能的可行性。方法选取51例肾移植术后1个月内的受者及26例健康志愿者,行肾脏斜冠状面3.0T MRDTI检查(扩散梯度方向6,b值为0、300s/mm^2)。依据接受DTIMR检查当天的估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR),将所有受试者分为4组,(1)正常对照组(1组),为正常志愿者26例;(2)eGFR≥60ml·min^-1·1.73m^-2组(2组),24例受者;(3)30ml·min^-1·1.73m^-2≤eGFR〈60ml·min^-1·1.73m^-2组(3组),19例受者;(4)eGFR%30ml·min^-1·1.73m^-2组(4组),8例受者。分别测量和计算各组肾脏皮髓质的ADC值和FA值,并采用配对样本t检验和单因素方差分析进行比较,采用Pearson积差相关分析分析移植肾皮髓质ADC值和FA值与eGFR间相关性。结果各移植组受者间皮质FA值均无明显差异(P〉0.05),但均显著低于1组的皮质FA值(P〈0.01)。随着eGFR的降低,各移植组髓质FA值、ADC值及皮质ADC值均呈递减趋势,且各组间差异均有显著统计学意义(P〈0.05),其中以髓质FA值的差异最为显著。移植肾髓质FA值、ADC值及皮质ADC值与eGFR呈明显正相关(r值分别为0.812、0.756、0.757,P〈0.01)。FA图和ADC图显示,3组与4组移植。肾皮髓质分辨明显减低,扩散张量示踪图显示3组与4组移植肾髓质内纤维束样结构明显稀疏、减少,尤以4组为著。结论DTI评价肾移植术后早期移植肾功能的改变具有可行性,不仅能够定量,而且可以从形态学上有效鉴别处于不同功能状态的移植肾。 Objective To investigate the feasibility of magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) as a noninvasive way for assessment of kidney transplant function in the early posttransplantation period. Method Fifty-one kidney transplant recipients less than 1 month after kidney transplantation and 26 age-matched healthy volunteers were included and examined using a fatsaturated echo-planar DTI sequence in oblique-coronal orientation at 3.0 Tesla magnetic resonance (MR) imager (diffusion directions= 6 , b = 0, 300 s/mm^2 ). According to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) recorded and calculated on the examined day, all subjects were divided into four groups., group 1, healthy volunteers (n = 26) ; group 2, eGFR≥60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 (n = 24) ; group 3, 30≤eGFR〈60 mL/min/1.73 m^2 (n = 19) ; group 4, eGFR〈30 mL/min/1.73 m^2 (n = 8). Mean apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and mean fractional anisotropy (FA) were determined separately for the cortex and the medulla. The paired Student's t test was used to compare ADC and FA between cortex and medulla within each group. ADC and FA between groups were compared by using the oneway analysis of variance test. Relationship between ADC and FA with eGFR of the transplants was assessed by using Pearson correlation analysis. Result Mean cortical FA was significantly higher in group 1 than in other three groups (P〈0. 01 for all), while differences among groups of allograft recipients were not significant (P〉0. 05 for all). There was a gradually decreasing trend of medullary FA and ADC, and cortical ADC from group 2 to group 4, and the differences among groups were all pronounced (P〈0. 05 for all). In renal allografts, there was a significant positive correlation between eGFR and medullary FA, medullary ADC as well as cortical ADC (r = 0.812, 0.756, 0.757, respectively, P〈0. 01). The cortical-medullary discrimination of FA-map and ADC-map in group 3 and group 4 apparently decreased. Meanwhile, DTI revealed that the radial diffusion tracts in the medulla of group 3 and group 4 obviously broke off and reduced, especially in group 4. Conclusion DTI is a promising way to evaluate kidney transplant function early after transplantion, and can quantitatively and visually distinguish transplants with different functions.
出处 《中华器官移植杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第11期662-667,共6页 Chinese Journal of Organ Transplantation
关键词 肾移植 磁共振 扩散张量成像 肾小球滤过率 Kidney transplantatiom Magnetic resonance Diffusion tensor imaging Estimated glomerular filtration rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献19

  • 1Lodhi SA, Meier-Kriesche HU. Kidney allograft survival: the long and short of it [J]. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 2011, 26 (1):15-17.
  • 2朱兰,林正斌,陈松,郭晖,刘慎微,黄伟,谢林,陈刚.肾移植术后早期抗体介导的急性排斥反应三例[J].中华器官移植杂志,2013,34(4):219-222. 被引量:2
  • 3Jiang SH, Karpe KM, Talaulikar GS. Safety and predictors of complications of renal biopsy in the outpatient setting[J]. Clin Nephrol, 2011, 76(6) :464-469.
  • 4Hueper K, Gutberlet M, Rodt T, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging and tractography for assessment of renal allograft dysfunction-initial results [J]. Eur Radiol, 2011, 21 (11) : 2427-2433.
  • 5Lanzman RS, Ljimani A, Pentang G, et al. Kidney transplant: functional assessment with diffusion-tensor MR Imaging at 3T[J]. Radiology, 2013, 266(1): 218-225.
  • 6Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, et al. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group[J]. Ann Intern Med, 1999, 130 (6) :461-470.
  • 7National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification, and stratification[J]. Am J Kidney Dis, 2002, 39(2) : S1-266.
  • 8范文骏,龙淼淼,沈文,倪红艳,黄黎香.Cine-MRI测量健康成年人肾脏运动幅度[J].中国医学影像学杂志,2013,21(5):380-382. 被引量:4
  • 9Thoeny HC, Zumstein D, Simon-Zoula S, et al. Functional evaluation of transplanted kidneys with diffusion-weighted and BOLD MR imaging: initial experience [J]. Radiology, 2006, 241 (3) : 812-821.
  • 10Palmucci S, Mauro LA, Failla G, et al. Magnetic resonance with diffusion-weighted imaging in the evaluation of transplanted kidneys: updating results in 35 patients [J]. Transplant Proc, 2012, 44(7):1884-1888.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Vo AA, Lukovsky M, Toyoda M, et al. Rituximab and intravenous immune globulin for desensitization during renal transplantation. N Engl J ivied, 2008, 359(3):242-251.
  • 2Terasaki PI. Humoral theory of transplantation. Am J Transplant, 2003, 3(6):665-673.
  • 3ColvinRB, Smith RN. Antibody-mediated organ-allograft rejection. Nat Rev Immunol, 2005, 5(10):807-817.
  • 4Barrel G, Schwaiger E, Bohmig GA. Prevention and treatment of alloantibody- mediated kidney transplant rejection. Transpl Int, 2011, 24(12):1142-1155.
  • 5Roberts DM,Jiang SH, Chadban SJ. The treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients-a systematic review. Transplantation, 2012, 94(8):775-783.
  • 6Hueper K, Gutberlet M, Rodt T,et al. Diffusion tensor imagingand tractography for assessment of renal allograft dysfunction-initial results. Eur Radiol, 2011, 21(11): 2427-2433.
  • 7Kido A, Kataoka M, Yamamoto A, et al. Diffusion tensor MRIof the kidney at 3.0 and 1.5 Tesla. Acta Radiol, 2010, 51(9):1059-1063.
  • 8Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F, Oyen RH, et al. Diffusion-weightedMR imaging of kidneys in healthy volunteers and patients withparenchymal diseases: initial experience. Radiology, 2005,235(3):911-917.
  • 9Yildirim E, Kirbas I,Teksam M, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRimaging of kidneys in renal artery stenosis. Eur J Radiol, 2008,65(4): 148-153.
  • 10Kataoka M,Kido A, Yamamoto A, et al. Diffusion tensor imagingof kidney with respiratory triggering: optimization of parametersto demonstrate anisotropic structures on fraction anisotropy maps.J Magn Reson Imaging, 2009,29(3): 736-744.

共引文献4

同被引文献14

引证文献3

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部