期刊文献+

罗马帝国衰落的起点——以琉善对公元2世纪罗马社会的认识为中心

The Starting Point of the Decline of the Roman Empire: Centres on Lucian's Understanding about the Roman Society in the Second Century
下载PDF
导出
摘要 公元2世纪的罗马帝国,并非如后世学者所断定的那般全面昌盛。吉本称这一时期为"黄金时代"。其实,这种说法略有不妥。从彼时罗马人的视角去考察,可以看到帝国更加真实的面貌。琉善这位2世纪帝国的重要学者,敏锐地观察到繁华背后的衰败因子。深入分析解读琉善的作品,总结其眼中的罗马社会风貌,探索罗马帝国衰落的起点是本文的研究重点。从琉善的作品中,可以看出2世纪的罗马社会业已沉醉于浮华生活,失去了以往奋发向上的精神气质。罗马帝国精神层面的衰退早在公元2世纪就已经出现了。 The Roman Empire in the second century was not as all-round prosperity as the later generation scholars asserted. Edward Gibbon called this period golden age. In fact, this judgment is not entirely accurate. Observing from the viewpoint of the Roman who had lived in that time, scholars would see a clearer picture of the Empire. Lucian, who was an important intellectual of the Roman Empire at that time, keenly observed the declining origin behind prosperity. The key point of this article is to analyze the Roman society in the second century by making a systematic analysis and interpretation of Lucian's works, and to thus trace to the starting point of the decline of the Empire. From the instances that Lucian criticized, we find out that the Roman society in the second century had already indulged in glitzy lifestyle and lost the indomitable temperament of bygone days.
作者 倪滕达
出处 《古代文明》 CSSCI 2015年第1期9-21,112,共13页 The Journal of Ancient Civilizations
基金 中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助 项目名称是"琉善眼中的二世纪罗马社会探析"(项目批号:002-105577GK)
关键词 琉善 罗马帝国 衰落 社会风气 Lucian Roman Empire Decline Social Conduct
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[德]马克思,恩格斯:《德意志意识形态》,《马克思恩格斯全集》第三卷,人民出版社,1960,第544页.
  • 2杨共乐.早期罗马宗教传统的特点[J].河北学刊,2008,28(2):96-98. 被引量:5
  • 3[德]恩格斯.《论原始基督教的历史》(1894),《马克思恩格斯选集》第4卷,北京:人民出版社,1995年,第473-474页.
  • 4[德]恩格斯.《大陆上社会改革的进展》(1843年),《马克思恩格斯全集》第1卷,北京:人民出版社,1955年,第585页.
  • 5[德]马克思.《论犹太人问题》(1843年),《马克思恩格斯全集》第1卷,北京:人民出版社,1955年,第4259页.
  • 6黄玉.知识分子与国家:对立、依附与融合[J].开放时代,2006(6):55-69. 被引量:9
  • 7[德]恩格斯.《论早期基督教的历史》,《马克思恩格斯全集》第22卷,北京:人民出版社,1965年,第527页.
  • 8汪振军.公共领域、舆论监督与公共知识分子[J].广西社会科学,2004(7):28-30. 被引量:8

二级参考文献57

  • 1黄平.《当代中国大陆知识分子的非知识分子化》[J].香港《二十一世纪》,1995,(4):156-156.
  • 2金耀基.《中国政治与文化》[M].香港:牛津大学出版社(中国)有限公司,1997..
  • 3普鲁塔克.努马传[A].黄宏熙.希腊罗马名人传:上册[M].北京:商务印书馆,1990.
  • 4Konrad, George & Ivan Szelenyi. 1979. The Intellectuals on the Road to Class Power. Translated by A.Arato & R. E. Allen. Sussex: Harvester Press.64.
  • 5Konrad, George & Ivan Szelenyi.1991. "Intellectuals and Domination in Post-Communist Societies." Pp337-61 in Social Theory for a Changing Society, edited by Pierre Bourdieu and James S. Coleman. Bouhter: Westview Press,NewYork: Russell Sage Foundation.
  • 6Lipset, S.M. and Asoke Basu. 1976. "The Roles of the Intellectual and Political Roles." Pp 111-150 in The Intelligentsia and the Intellectuals, edited by Alexander Gella. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications.
  • 7Ma, Shu-Yun. 1998. "Clicntelism: Foreign Attention, and Chinese Intellectual Autonomy." Modern China, Vol. 24, Issue 4, pp445-471.
  • 8Madsen, Richard. 1990. "The Spiritual Crisis of China's Intellectuals." Pp. 243-260 in Chinese Society on the Eve of Tiananmen,edited by Deborah Davisand E. F. Vogel. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • 9McCormick, Barrett L.1990. Political Reform in Post-Mao China. Berkeley, Oxford: University of California Press.
  • 10Misra, Kalpana 1998. From Post-Maoism to Post-Marxism: The Erosion of Official Ideology in Deng's China.Routledge, New York and London.

共引文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部