摘要
"同案同判"是来自社会公众的强烈诉求,它产生于法律适用过程中法律具体化所造成的判决差异之语境,成为法官在裁判实践中需要面对的一项可能要求。"同案同判"的吸引力主要在于内在于法律实践的平等价值和安定性价值;但是其与裁判正确性的要求未必相一致,因而作为一项司法要求它是初始性的,法官可基于更具优势的理由而摒弃既有判例。对"同案同判"的分析有益于深化对我国案例指导制度的思考。
'Treating like cases alike'becomes the strong appeal from society in china. It arises from the condition of the different verdicts resulted from the implementation of law in the course of the application of law. As a possible requirement,'treating like cases alike'should be seriously taken into account for judges,and it can be justified by the value of equity and determinacy,which are the internal essential of legal practice. However,it could be inconsistent with the correction of verdict,it is a presumptive requirement,and judges can reject it in virtue of more convincing reasons. The analysis of 'treating like cases alike'is conducive for the consideration of case guidance system in china.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第1期21-27,共7页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基金
教育部人文社会科学青年基金(14YJC820051)
关键词
同案同判
平等价值
安定性价值
裁判正确性
案例指导制度
treat like cases alike
the value of equity
the value of determinacy
the correction of verdict
case guidance system
