摘要
我国《刑事诉讼法》引入了"排除合理怀疑"的概念,作为"事实清楚,证据确实、充分"的判断标准。我国"排除合理怀疑"的主体具有多样性的特点,这也使得该标准具有了一定的层次性,有利于减少片面追求证据完备的法定证据主义传统,充分发挥办案人员在刑事诉讼中的司法能动性。合议庭和审判委员是我国最主要的审判组织,其决议规则和对案件的处理程序存在自身的特点,在审判阶段适用"排除合理怀疑"可能会遇到诸多问题,需要在理论上和实践中予以积极探索解决。
The newly revised Criminal Procedure Law of PRC introduced the standard of proof 'beyond reasoned doubt'in its Article 53,which as the most important standard of 'clear facts,unquestionable and sufficient evidences'.This article focused on those controversies,discussed the conception of reasonable doubt and the deliberation rule. Along with the current criminal justice system in China,it also pointed out that this standard enriched the existing levels of proof.Besides,this article analyzed the problems that may occur in the collegial panel and judicial committee when implementing the standard of 'beyond reasonable doubt'and made some corresponding solutions.
出处
《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2015年第1期159-166,共8页
Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
合理怀疑
证明标准
合议庭
审判委员会
reasonable doubt
standard of proof
collegial panel
judicial committee
