试论林纾和嵇文甫的船山史论选评——兼谈时代与史学批评之关系

Selective Reviews on Wang Chuanshan's Historical Comments by Lin Shu and Ji Wenfu

20世纪的初期和中叶,林纾和嵇文甫分别撰有《评选船山史论》和《王船山史论选评》,一则为学生揣摩练习作文而作,一则为批判而撷取其思想精华而作。面对共同的对象《读通鉴论》,在船山所论秦至南北朝时段的史事内,两者选评的对象仅有一论重合。本文尝试就两者的撰述旨趣、内容、批评视角和各自所反映的时代特征之异作初步的梳理。

Lin Shu's Selective Reviews on WANG Chuanshan's Historical Comments was written for the students as an example of pose comment,while Ji Wenfu's Selective Reviews on Wang Chuanshan's Historical Comments was written to absorbe the essence of its thoughts.These two books reviewed only on one shared object,but each had its own choice.This paper attempts to research into some of the differences between them.