摘要
对于不同的足背皮肤软组织缺损、骨外露的损伤,依据损伤的层次不同而差异选取不同的临床修复方式所导致治疗结局是不同的,本文旨在比较两种不同的足背皮肤软组织缺损修复方式的临床治疗疗效,以便评估其更加有效而恰当的处理方式,为加快促进患者创面愈合,减少感染率,缩短治疗周期,提高患者疗效,减少致残率及医疗费用、缩短住院日,改善患者功能提供一定的参考.
For different foot dorsum skin and soft tissue defection and bone exposure, different clinical treatment may lead to different outcomes for the patients with suchwound according to the damage level. The purpose of this paper is to compare two different ways of foot dorsum skin soft tissue defect of the clinical curative effect, in order to choosethe more effective and proper approach to handle it, to speed up the wound healing of the patients, to reduce the infection rate and shorten the treatment cycle. Besides it will help toimprove patient curative effect, to decrease the morbidity, and the medical costs, shorten such confinement, and give some reference to improve the function of patients.
出处
《河南中医》
2014年第B11期255-256,共2页
Henan Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
足背皮肤缺损
骨外露
腓肠神经营养血管远端蒂岛状筋膜皮瓣
游离中厚皮瓣
VSD负压吸引
Foot dorsum skin defect, bone exposed, distal sural nerve nutrient vessels pedicled island fascia flap and free medium thickness skin flap, the VSD pressure suction