摘要
目的:对舒尼替尼治疗转移性肾癌的疗效进行系统评价。方法:采取Cochrance系统评价方法,检索Cochrance图书馆(2005-2014)、Pubmed(2000年1月-2014年2月)、EMBASE(1991年1月-2014年2月)、中国知网(2000年1月-2014年2月)和万方数据库(2000年1月-2014年2月)等数据库有关舒尼替尼与干扰素或IL-2治疗转移性肾癌进展的随机对照临床试验的文献纳入研究。采用RevMan 5.2软件对提取资料中纳入研究进行meta分析。结果:共有3篇文献符合纳入标准,共984例患者。Meta分析结果显示:与对照组相比舒尼替尼在缓解肿瘤方面存在优势[OR=3.79,95%CI(2.59,5.54),P<0.000 01]。舒尼替尼与对照组发生严重不良反应有统计学差异[OR=0.62,95%CI(0.39,0.99),P≤0.05],舒尼替尼较对照组发生严重不良反应相对较少。结论:与对照组相比舒尼替尼单用能更有效缓解肿瘤,而不增加严重不良药物反应风险。
Objective:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.Methods:We searched the Cochrane Library,Pubmed,EMBASE,CNKI and WANFANG DATA from the establishment of each database to February 2014.Database related to randomized controlled trials(RCTs)comparing sunitinib with interferon or IL-2treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma was included in the study.Both the study selection and the meta-analysis were conducted according to the Cochrane Handbook for systematic reviews.Data were extracted from these trials and analyzed by RevMan 5.2software.Results:Three RCTs involving 984 patients were identified.According to the different interventions for metastatic renal cell carcinoma,results from meta-analysis showed the sunitinib's benefit on treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma compared with control group(OR=3.79,95%CI[2.59,5.54],P〈0.000 01).Incidences of drug-related serious adverse events were statistical difference between sunitinib and control group(OR=0.62,95%CI[0.39,0.99],P ≤0.05).The proportion of patients with serious adverse events was higher in the control group.Conclusion:Compared with control group,sunitinib could inhibit tumor progression more effectively and it would not increase the risk of serious adverse events.
出处
《武汉大学学报(医学版)》
CAS
2015年第1期82-85,共4页
Medical Journal of Wuhan University
关键词
舒尼替尼
转移性肾癌
META分析
Sunitinib
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
Meta-Analysis