期刊文献+

量词结构与假部分结构的统一分析 被引量:16

Unified analysis of classifier constructions and pseudo-partitive constructions
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文以最简方案为理论框架,对汉语的量词结构和英语的假部分结构进行了统一分析。本文认为,量词结构和假部分结构在句法上具有同一性,都应分析为以轻名词n为中心语的投射nP。前者中的轻名词实现为量词,基础生成于n节点下;后者不包含显性轻名词,由度量词提升嫁接到n位置,形成[n+N]结构。n和[n+N]都能够与下层物质名词形成探针-目标关系,通过一致操作,消除物质名词的[-可数性]特性,使数量表达得以实现。各语言间在数量表达上的差异源于词汇特性而非语言类型的差异。 The paper conducts a unified analysis of classifier constructions(CC) and pseudo-partitive constructions(PPC) under the framework of MP. Based on a range of evidence, we argue that PPC are syntactically identical with CC, both having a light noun projection nP. In CC, n is realized as the classifier. As for PPC, in which n has no phonetic realization, the measure word raises to n, forming the complex [n+N]. Both n and [n+N] form a Probe-Goal relationship with the following mass noun,erasing the [-countable] feature of the latter via Agreement. The difference in expressions of quantification among various languages lies in lexical properties rather than language types.
出处 《当代语言学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期56-70,126,共15页 Contemporary Linguistics
基金 “中国周边语言文化协同创新中心”支持
关键词 量词结构 假部分结构 轻名词 特征一致 classifier construction,pseudo-partitive construction,light noun,feature agreement
  • 相关文献

参考文献34

  • 1Abney, S. 1987. The English noun phrase in its sentential aspect Ph.D. diss., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
  • 2Au Yeung, B. W.-H. ( 欧阳伟豪). 1997. A parametric analysis of Cantonese and Mandarin nominals. Proceedings of the Postgraduate Research Forum on Language & Linguistics 7. Pp. 186-97.
  • 3Au Yeung, B. W.-H. ( 欧阳伟豪). 2005. An interface program for parameterization of classifiers in Chinese. Ph.D. diss., The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology.
  • 4Chao, Y.-R. (赵元任). 1968. A Grammar of Spoken Chinese. Berkeley, LA: University of California Press.
  • 5Cheng, L. L.-S. (郑礼珊) and R. Sybesma (司马翎). 1999. Bare and not-so-bare nouns and the structure of NP. Linguistic Inquiry 30, 509-42.
  • 6Chierchia, G. 1998. Reference to kindts across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6, 339-405.
  • 7Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  • 8Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase. In M. Kenstowicz, ed., Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Pp.1-52.
  • 9Chomsky, N.2005. Three factors in langnage design. Linguistic Inquiry 36, 1-22.
  • 10Chomsky, N. 2008. On phases. In R. Freidin, C.P. Otero, and M.L. Zubizarreta, eds. Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. Pp. 133-66.

二级参考文献72

共引文献362

同被引文献111

引证文献16

二级引证文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部