期刊文献+

蕴涵、预设和完备性 被引量:4

Entailment,presupposition and integrity
原文传递
导出
摘要 对完备性的追求是任何一种数学计算都必须遵守的基本原则。本文证明了五个"完备性公式",说明任何两个命题间的单向蕴涵关系P→Q,必须完备操作为Q是P的预设;而双向蕴涵关系P(?)Q,必须完备操作为Q与P等同。对前句的预设,在篇章中可采用三种不同的否定操作,只有少数动词如"后悔、谴责"等可采用直接否定。因为这一直接否定是由它们的特殊语义内容允准的,所以不能说它们没有"预设"只有"蕴涵"。文中还讨论了真值缺失、焦点否定以及其他与完备性有关的问题,以证明完备性对语言解释来说是必不可少的。 The desire for integrity is a basic principle of any kind of mathematical calculations.Five formulae of integrating processes are proved in this paper,and it is also proposed that the relation P →Q between two propositions must be integrated into that Q is P's presupposition,the relation P →Q must be integrated into equation between Q and P.There are three kinds of negation in text while which give different processes to the presupposition of a former sentence,and only a few verbs,such as REGRET,ACCUSE,etc.,can be processed under the direct negation.We can't say that these verbs have no presuppositions but only entailments,because the direct negation of them is permitted by their own special semantic meanings.Truth Value Gaps,Focus-Negation,and other issues about integration have been also studied in this paper for the purpose of revealing the necessity of integrity for language expression.
作者 陈振宇 钱鹏
出处 《当代语言学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期98-109,126,共12页 Contemporary Linguistics
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划基金项目<现代汉语句法与语义计算研究>(批准号:13YJA740005) 国家社科基金重点课题项目<现代汉语及方言中的否定问题研究>(批准号:12AYY001)的资助
关键词 完备性 蕴涵 预设 等同 否定 integrity entailment presupposition equation negation
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Gazdar, G. 1979. Pragmatics, Implicature, Presupposition and Logical Form. New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • 2Harnish, R.M. 1970. Studies in logic and language. Ph.D. diss., MIT, Cambridge, MA.
  • 3Horn, L.R. 2001. A Natural History of Negation. CSLI Publications.
  • 4Jackendoff, R. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press Karttunen, L. 1971. Implicative verbs. Language 47, 2: 340-58.
  • 5Jackendoff, R.1973. Presuppositions of compound sentences. Linguistic Imtrdry 4, 2: 169-93.
  • 6Kempson, R. 1975. Presupposition and the Delimitation of Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge Universiy Press.
  • 7Kiparsky, P. and C. Kiparsky. 1970. Fact. In M. Bierwisch and K. Heidolph, eds., Progress in Linguistics. The Hague: Mouton. Pp. 143-73.
  • 8Strawson, P.F. 1950. On referring. Mind 59, 320-44.
  • 9van Fraassen, B. 1969. Presuppositions, supervaluations, and free logic. In K. Lambert, Logical Way of Doing Things. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Pp.67-91.
  • 10Wilson, D. 1975. Presuppositions and Non-Truth-Conditional Semantics. New York, NY: Academic Press.

二级参考文献35

共引文献122

同被引文献48

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部