期刊文献+

现象图析学视域下的西方大学教学研究:观点、进展及问题 被引量:9

Research on Learning and Teaching in Higher Education in the Perspective of Phenomenography
原文传递
导出
摘要 现象图析学是西方大学学习与教学研究主要的理论基础。现象图析学作为一种学习理论与研究范式从联系和感知的视角重新解释学习,强调情境的作用和学习者的立场,推进了大学学习与教学研究的繁荣。现象图析学在大学学习与教学研究中的应用包括大学师生的教学方式及其影响因素、教学信念、教学环境感知,以及教学结果。未来进行现象图析学研究应该注意其在情境、文化、国别、解释性与实证性矛盾等方面存在的问题。 Phenomenography is the theoretical basis for research on learning and teaching in higher education learning in Western countries. As a learning theory and a research approach,phenomenography explains learning in the perspective of relation and perception, and emphasizes the role of situation and learner. Therefore, phenomenography is well suitable for research on learning in higher education. The application of phenomenography in higher education research includes college teachers' and students' approaches to teaching and learning and the affecting factors, conceptions of teaching and learning, perceptions of teaching and learning environment, and learning outcome. Future phenomenographic research should consider issues such as situation, culture, and the dilemma of the "interpretative" and the "positive".
出处 《比较教育研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期35-41,共7页 International and Comparative Education
基金 福建省教育科学"十二五"规划2012年度规划课题"福建省高校办学特色实证研究:基于学生的视角"(项目批准号:FJCEZZ12-015)的阶段成果
关键词 现象图析学 大学教学 学习方式 教学信念 phenomenography college teaching approaches to learning conceptions of teaching and learning
  • 相关文献

参考文献41

  • 1Haggis T. What Have We Been Thinking of A CriticalOverview of 40 Years of Student Learning Research inHigher Education[ J]. Studies in Higher Education,2009,34(4):377^390.
  • 2Richardson J. The Concepts and Methods of Phe-nomenographic Research [ J ]. Review of Educational Re-search, 1999,69(1) :53-82.
  • 3Entwistle N. Introduction:Phenomenography inHigher Education [J]. Higher Education Research and De-velopment, 1997,16(2):127-158.
  • 4Marton F,Booth S. Learning and Awareness[M]. Mah-wah,NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum Associates,1997.
  • 5MartonF. On Non-verbatim Learning:! Level of Processingand Level of Outcome [ J ]. Scandi navian Journal of Psy-chology, 1975 ,16(1):273?279.
  • 6Svensson,L. Manniskobilden i INOM—gruppens Forskning :Den Larande Manniskan[M]. Goteborg:Institutionenforped-agogik,Goteborgs universitet, 1984.
  • 7郭建鹏,杨凌燕,史秋衡.西方高校师生教学信念研究的缘起、进展及趋势[J].复旦教育论坛,2013,11(2):25-29. 被引量:7
  • 8MartonF,Saijo R. On Qualitative Differences in Leam-ing-Outcome and Process[j]. British Journal of Education-al Psychology, 1976,46( 1) :4?11.
  • 9Entwistle N, Tait H. Approaches to Learning, Evaluationsof Teaching,and Preferences for Contrasting AcademicEnvironments [ J]. Higher Education,1990,19( 2) : 169?194.
  • 10Biggs J. The Revised Two-factor StudyProcess Questionnaire : R-SPQ-2F [ J ]. British Journal ofEducational Psychology,2001,71(1): 133-149.

二级参考文献40

  • 1Diseth, A. Students' evaluation of teaching, approaches to learning, and academic achievement [J]. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Researeh, 2007, (2).
  • 2Cano F. Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influence on academic performance [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005, (2).
  • 3Prosser, M., & Trigweil, K. Perceptions of the teaching environment and its relationship to approaches to teaching [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1997, ( 1 ).
  • 4Hu, L., & Bender, P. M. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternations [J]. Structural Equation Modeling, 1999, (6).
  • 5Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leu.ng, D. The revised two-factor study process questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 2001, (1).
  • 6Entwistle, N., Tait, H., & MaCune, V. Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts [J]. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 2000, ( 1 ).
  • 7Marton, F., Wen, Q., & Wong, K. 'Read a hundred times and the meaning will appear…' Changes in Chinese University students' views of the temporal structure of learning [J]. Higher Education, 2005, (3).
  • 8Marton, F., Dall' Alba, G., & Beaty. E. Conceptions of learning [J]. International Journal of Educational Research, 1993, (19).
  • 9Ramsden, P. A performance indicator of teaching quality in ihigher education: The course experience questionnaire [J]. Studies in Higher Education, 1991, i2).
  • 10Marton, F., & Saljo, R. On qualitative differences in learning I - Outcome and process [J]. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1976, ( 1 ).

共引文献198

同被引文献46

二级引证文献60

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部