期刊文献+

解释水平理论的应用及发展 被引量:48

The Application and Development of Construal Level Theory
下载PDF
导出
摘要 解释水平是指人们对于事物表征的不同抽象水平,这一抽象水平有高有低。早期的研究侧重于探讨解释水平变化的底层心理机制,即心理距离对于解释水平的影响。而近年来,研究者侧重于解释水平理论的应用研究,即探讨它在说服、谈判、消费者行为等领域的应用。这一应用体现在营销及消费者行为研究、社会认知研究、决策及协商研究、社会化研究中。另外,解释水平理论的应用研究,还推动了其底层心理机制研究的发展,进一步完善了其理论体系。 Construal level denotes the different abstract levels of the representation of objects, and this abstract lewd is of different degree. The highlighting research in the early stage of Construal Level Theory is the exploration of the underlying psychological mechanism, which researches the implication of psychological distance for construal level. In recent years, researchers highlight the applied researches of the Construal Level Theory, which survey its application in the territories of persuasion, negotiation, and consumer beaviors etc. And its application reflects on the researches of marketing and consumer behavior, social cognition, decision making and negotiation, socialization. Besides, the applied researches of Construal Level Theory put forward the research of the underlying psychological mechanism, which improves the development of Construal Level Theory.
出处 《心理科学进展》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2015年第1期110-119,共10页 Advances in Psychological Science
基金 教育部人文社会科学规划项目(项目号:10YJAXLX011) 国家社会科学基金重点项目(项目号13AZD087)
关键词 解释水平 消费者行为 社会认知 决策 社会化 construal level consumer behavior social cognition decision making socialization
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献225

  • 1唐小飞,周庭锐,陈淑青.价格促销与D&B忠诚模式关联实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2006(10):121-128. 被引量:16
  • 2Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Effects of fluency on psychological distance and mental construal. Psychological Science, 19(2), 161-167.
  • 3Armor, D. A., & Sackett, A. M. (2006). Accuracy, error, and bias in predictions for real versus hypothetical events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91 (4), 583-600.
  • 4Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., & Trope, Y. (2006). The association between psychological distance and construal level: Evidence from an implicit association test. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(4), 609-622.
  • 5Bar-Anan, Y., Liberman, N., Trope, Y., & Algom, D. (2007). Automatic processing of psychological distance: Evidence from a Stroop task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 136(4), 610-622.
  • 6Bilgin, B., & Brenner, L. (2008). Temporal distance moderates description dependence of subjective probability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44(3), 890-895.
  • 7Day, S. B., & Bartels, D. M. (2004). Temporal distance, event representation, and similarity. Paper presented at the 26th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Chicago, IL.
  • 8Day, S. B., & Bartels, D. M. (2006). Representation across time: Generalizing temporal effects on perceived similarity. Paper presented at the 28th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Vancouver, Canada.
  • 9Day, S. B., & Barrels, D. M. (2008). Representation over time: The effects of temporal distance on similarity. Cognition, 106, 1504-1513.
  • 10Dhar, R., & Kim, E. Y. (2007). Seeing the forest or the trees:Implications of construal level theory for consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(2), 96-100.

共引文献296

同被引文献639

引证文献48

二级引证文献221

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部