期刊文献+

美国择校政策的运行机制及其启示——以波士顿“基于家庭的择校计划”为例

下载PDF
导出
摘要 波士顿"基于家庭的择校计划"是美国马萨诸塞州运用最为广泛的择校机制。该机制一方面给予家庭更多样的学校选择,另一方面又通过公共教育资源的再分配保证了弱势群体获得优质教育资源的权利和机会。同时,它又为公立学校系统引入了竞争机制,从而提高了整体教育质量。波士顿择校机制充分体现了国家在现代教育治理结构中运用公共政策维护教育公平正义的价值取向,这对于我国制订择校政策具有借鉴意义。
作者 葛孝亿
出处 《中国教育学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2015年第1期41-46,共6页 Journal of The Chinese Society of Education
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1辛占强.对我国义务教育阶段家庭教育选择权合理性的论证[J].上海教育科研,2007(3):18-20. 被引量:8
  • 2Leube R Kurt. The Essence of Friedman[M]. Stanford,Cali-fornia :Hoover Institution Press, 1987.
  • 3C00KS0N W PETER JR. School choice : the struggle forthe soul of American education [M]. New Haven : Yale Uni-versity Press, 1994: 100.
  • 4National Center for Education Statistics. The Nation * s Re-port Card: Mathematics 2007 [ EB/OL] . (2010-5 -11 )[2014 -11 -21 ]. http: // nces. ed. gov/nationsreportcard/pd^main2007/2007494. pdf.
  • 5National Commission on Excellence in Education : A Nationat Risk: the Imperative for Educational Reform. The Com-mission ,1983.
  • 6National Commission on Excellence in Education. A Nationat Risk : the Imperative for Educational Reform [R]. Wash-ington D C:US Government Printing Office, 1983 :5.
  • 7National Assessment Governing Board, US Department ofEducation. Reading framework for the 2007 National As-sessment of Educational Progress[ EB/OL] http ://www. ed-pubs. gov/document/ed002606p. pdf.
  • 8Student Assignment Policy [ EB/OL] . [ 2014-11 -21 ]. ht-tp :// www. bostonpublicschools. org/ assignment.
  • 9Boston Public School Assignment Proposals Analysis [ EB/OL]. [ 2014-11 -21 ]. http : //www. mapc. org/bpsanalysis.
  • 10胡咏梅,屠彦斌.美国择校制度的公平与效率分析[J].外国中小学教育,2006(12):1-7. 被引量:13

二级参考文献13

  • 1张文显,姚建宗.权利时代的理论景象[J].法制与社会发展,2005,11(5):3-15. 被引量:134
  • 2[德]耶林,胡宝海译.《为权利而斗争》.梁慧星.《民商法沦丛》第2卷.北京:法律出版社,1994年版..
  • 3[法]亨利·勒帕日著,李燕生译.美国新自由主义经济学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1985.
  • 4Caroline M. Hoxbv, Would School Choice Change the Teaching Profession? January 2002,preprint.
  • 5Press release, Growth in Charter School Reflects Increasing Demands for Choices, Center for Education Reform, December 20, 2002.
  • 6Hudson Institute, Charter Schools in Action Project: Final Report,1997, Indianapolis, IN:Hudson Institue,1997.
  • 7Joseph L. Bast , Herbert J. Walberg, Can parents choose the best schools for their children?Economics of Education Review, 23 (2004) 431 - 440.
  • 8弗里德曼著,张瑞玉译.资本主义与自由[M].上海:商务印书馆,1986,87.
  • 9Jay P, Greene, PH.D., An Evaluation on the Florida A-Plus Accountability and School Choice Program, Manhattan Institute for Policy Research,February 2001.
  • 10吕世伦主编,徐爱国著.《分析法学》,北京:法律出版社,2005年版,第36页.

共引文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部