期刊文献+

药物临床试验数据失真性辨析 被引量:2

Analysis on nauthentic data in new drug clinical trials
原文传递
导出
摘要 临床试验数据的真实性与准确性是极其重要的,任何失真性数据都可能影响临床试验结果,造成不可弥补的损失。笔者认为临床试验失真性数据,即包括主观造假的数据,也包括客观形成的不准确数据。笔者通过对临床试验失真性数据的一系列特征表述,探讨了辨识方法,并分析、归纳其产生的原因。这些原因包括对试验结果的主观干预、研究者GCP知识水平参差不齐、研究者对试验方案的理解与认识误差等。最终提出通过加强研究者及相关人员的科研素质教育、加强数据采集过程质量控制等手段来防止临床试验失真性数据产生的对策与建议。 The authenticity and accuracy of data in clinical trials is extremely important. Any inauthentic data may affect the result of a clinical trial, and cause great loss. In our opinion, inauthentic data includes not only man-made spurious data, but also inaccurate data objectively formed. In this article, the features of inauthentic data are described, how to distinguish inauthentic data is discussed, and the causes of this kind of data are analyzed and concluded, which include : subjective intervention on the result of clinical trials, differentiation of the GCP knowledge level between different investigators, misunderstanding of the protocol, et al. And finally we propose that scientific training to investigators and other involved personnel and quality control during the course of data collection should be strengthened to prevent the occur of inauthentic data in clinical trials.
作者 刘萍
出处 《中国中药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第24期4873-4876,共4页 China Journal of Chinese Materia Medica
基金 国家"重大新药创制"科技重大专项(2008ZX09312-012/2013ZX093033014)
关键词 药物临床试验 数据 失真性辨析 new drug clinical trial data inauthenticity analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1Sharpe N.Clinical trials and the real world:selection bias and generalisability of trial results.Cardiovasc Drugs Ther.2002;16(1):75-77.
  • 2Grapow MT,von Wattenwyl R,Guller U,Beyersdorf F,Zerkowski HR.Randomized controlled trials do not reflect reality:real-world analyses are critical for treatment guidelines.J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg.2006;132(1):5-7.
  • 3Godwin M,Ruhland L,Casson I,MacDonald S,Delva D,Birtwhistle R,Lam M,Seguin R.Pragmatic controlled clinical trials in primary care:the struggle between external and internal validity.BMC Med Res Methodol.2003;3:28.
  • 4Karanicolas PJ,Montori VM,Devereaux PJ,Schünemann H,Guyatt GH.A new "mechanistic-practical" framework for designing and interpreting randomized trials.J Clin Epidemiol.2009;62(5):479-484.
  • 5Fox KAA.An introduction to the global registry of acute coronary events:GRACE.Eur Heart J.2000;2(Suppl F):F21-F24.
  • 6Mossello E,Tonon E,Caleri V,Tilli S,Cantini C,Cavallini MC,Bencini F,Mecacci R,Marini M,Bardelli F,Sarcone E,Razzi E,Biagini CA,Masotti G.Effectiveness and safety of cholinesterase inhibitors in elderly subjects with Alzheimer's disease:a "real world" study.Arch Gerontol Geriatr Suppl.2004;(9):297-307.
  • 7Cazzoletti L,Marcon A,Janson C,Corsico A,Jarvis D,Pin I,Accordini S,Almar E,Bugiani M,Carolei A,Cerveri I,Duran-Tauleria E,Gislason D,Gulsvik A,Jogi R,Marinoni A,Martinez-Moratalla J,Vermeire P,de-Marco R.Asthma control in Europe:a real-world evaluation based on an international population-based study.J Allergy Clin Immunol.2007;120(6):1360-1367.
  • 8Gale CP,Manda SOM,Batin PD,Weston CF,Birkhead JS,Hall AS.Predictors of in-hospital mortality for patients admitted with ST-elevation myocardial infarction:a real-world study using the Myocardial Infarction National Audit Project (MINAP) database.Heart.2008;94(11):1407-1412.
  • 9Lasalvia A,Bonetto C,Cristofalo D,Tansella M,Ruggeri M.Predicting clinical and social outcome of patients attending real world mental health services:a 6-year multi-wave follow-up study.Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl.2007;(437):16-30.
  • 10Gartlehner G,Hansen RA,Nissman D,Lohr KN,Carey TS.A simple and valid tool distinguished efficacy from effectiveness studies.J Clin Epidemiol.2006;59(10):1040-1048.

共引文献126

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部