期刊文献+

家属对癌症晚期患者终末期治疗与抢救决策的质性研究 被引量:16

Qualitative Analysis of Family Members' Decision Making on Treatment and Resuscitation of Terminal Stage Advanced Cancer Patients
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解社区临终关怀中家属对癌症晚期患者终末期治疗与抢救决策的现实与意愿,为社区有效开展临终关怀服务提供指引。方法 2013年4—9月,采用质性研究中的现象学研究方法,对12名癌症晚期患者的家属进行深入访谈,并用现象学分析法进行资料分析整理,提出主题。结果家属对癌症晚期患者终末期治疗和抢救决策涉及:临终期治疗与抢救方法、救治地点、救治决策意见的形成等。其中方法以姑息治疗为主,终末抢救以无创抢救为主,只有个别家属能做到放弃无效抢救;地点以医院为主,较少能够实施居家关怀;家属对癌症晚期患者临终期治疗与抢救决策占主导作用。结论家属对癌症晚期患者终末期治疗与抢救的决策理念距临终关怀的目标仍有较大差距,我国的临终关怀事业需要社会层面广泛的死亡教育宣传、普及和国家出台相关政策支持、引导,以及从事临终关怀的医务人员的适时引导。 Objective To understand the status of family members' decision making and willingness on treatment and resuscitation of terminal stage advanced cancer patients in community hospice,and provide guidance for effective delivery of hos-pice care in community. Methods Phenomenological methods of qualitative study were applied in the research. Family members of 12 patients with advanced cancer were interviewed in depth during April and September in 2013,data was compiled and ana-lyzed by phenomenological analysis and relevant themes were concluded. Results Family members' decision making on treatment and resuscitation of terminal stage advanced cancer patients involved:methods of treatment and resuscitation in terminal stage, location of treatment,formation of decisions on treatment,etc. Regarding the methods,palliative care was the main approach, non - invasive resuscitation was predominant in terminal stage,only individual family members could give up ineffective resuscita-tion. Hospital was predominant regarding the location,few family members could deliver care at home. Family members played the dominant role in decision making on treatment and resuscitation of terminal stage advanced cancer patients. Conclusion Large gap still exists between family members' philosophy of decision making on treatment and resuscitation of terminal stage advanced cancer patients and the target of end of life care. Universal end of life care education and publicity at the social level,policy sup-port and guidance from the government,proper instructions from hospice health professionals are essential for the development of hospice care.
出处 《中国全科医学》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2014年第31期3770-3772,3776,共4页 Chinese General Practice
关键词 癌症晚期患者 终末期治疗与抢救 决策 家属 质性研究 Advanced cacer patients Terminal stage treatment and resuscitation Decision making Family mem-bers Oualitative study
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献91

共引文献213

同被引文献126

  • 1朱采萍,王海琴.社区居民对舒缓疗护的认知和态度调查[J].上海医药,2013,34(8):44-46. 被引量:7
  • 2刘俊荣.医患沟通中的“告知”[J].中国卫生事业管理,2005,21(7):410-412. 被引量:13
  • 3郎黎薇,李惠玲,沈利敏,陈惠芬,李红霞,黄回,陈胡安琪.综合型医院安宁照护现状及对策的质性研究[J].护理研究(上旬版),2006,20(9):2342-2344. 被引量:6
  • 4朱勤红.临床护理路径在骨科单病种中的应用[J].中国实用护理杂志,2013.29(z2):71-72.
  • 5吴柏毅,蔡甫昌,陈庆余.病患的决定能力[J].当代医学,2004,31 ( 368 ):482 -486.
  • 6蔡甫昌,潘恒嘉,吴泽玫,等.预立医疗计划之伦理与法律议题[J].台湾医学,2006,10 (4) : 517-531.
  • 7Colvin ER, Myhre MJ, Welch J, et al.Moving beyond the Patient Self -Determination Act: educating patients to beautonomous [ J ]. ANNA J, 1993,20(5): 564 -568.
  • 8Emanuel L. Living wills can help doctors andpatients talk about dying [ J]. West J Med,2000,173 (6) ; 368 -369.
  • 9庄荣彬.安宁缓和医疗条例专业人员作业手册[J].安宁疗护,2000,6 (1): 37-42.
  • 10Liu JM,Lin WC, Chen YM,et al. Thestatus of the do - not - resuscitate order inChinese clinical trial patients in a cancercentre [ J ]. J Med Ethics, 1999,25(4): 309 -314.

引证文献16

二级引证文献104

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部