摘要
结合《中国科技资源导刊》编辑部审理稿件的实践,分析专家审稿存在的问题,阐述增加稿件分类和集体审稿步骤后取得的成效,并对改进审稿方式和审稿内容提出了建议。
Based on the peer review practice of the Editorial Board of Chinese Science & Technology Resource Review, this paper analyzes the existing problems in the peer review, and elaborates the effects of increasing the steps of manuscript classification and collective review. Then, combined with the experience of the editorial office, the author proposes some suggestions on improving peer review methods and contents.
出处
《编辑学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2014年第6期567-569,共3页
Acta Editologica
关键词
科学技术期刊
学术质量
审稿过程
编辑实践
质量控制措施
sci-tech academic journal
academic quality
review process
editing practices
quality control measures