期刊文献+

综合运用LOGIT模型和AHP法预测部队联合投送方式分担率 被引量:4

On the Application of the LOGIT Model and the AHP Method to Forecasting the Sharing Rate of Each of the Projection Modes for the Combined Projection of Troops
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在组织部队联合投送时需综合利用多种投送方式,合理确定各种投送方式的分担率十分重要,传统上多用定性方法确定,随意性较大。采用多项LOGIT模型,结合AHP分析法,对部队组织联合投送时各种投送方式的分担率进行了预测,为合理选择各种投送方式、拟制部队投送计划方案提供科学依据。 It is extremely important to determine the rational sharing rate of each of the various proj ection modes when the projection of troops is organized and needs to use the combined proj ection modes.Traditionally,the qualitative method was mostly applied to determining the sharing rates,the results of which were often rather random.Therefore,in this paper the sharing rate of each of the proj ection modes for the combined proj ection of troops is forecasted by means of quite a few LOGIT models in combination with the AHP method.The paper may provide scientific gist for selecting the most rational projection mode,and help to work out the proj ection scheme for troops.
作者 海军 苑德春
出处 《国防交通工程与技术》 2014年第6期28-32,共5页 Traffic Engineering and Technology for National Defence
关键词 LOGIT模型 层次分析法 联合投送 分担率 LOGIT model AHP method combined projection sharing rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献25

  • 1常刚,刘宝新,宋凯.应用灰色评价理论选择最优军事运输方式研究[J].数学的实践与认识,2007,37(3):57-63. 被引量:10
  • 2PALMA A D, ROCHAT D. Mode choice for trips to work in Geneva: an empirical analysis[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2000, 8(1):43-51.
  • 3BHARAT P, BHATTE O I. Errors in variables in multino- mial choice modeling: a simulation study applied to a muhino- mial logit model of travel mode choice[J]. Transport Policy, 2011, 18(2): 326-335.
  • 4LIMTANAKOOL N, DUST M, SCHWANEN T. The influ ence of socioeconomic characteristics, land use and travel time considerations on mode choice for medium and longer-distance trips[J]. Journal of Transport Geography, 2006, 14(5): 327-341.
  • 5LEMP J D, KOCKELMEN K M, DAMIEN P. The continu- ous cross-nested logit model: formulation and application for departure time choice[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2010, 44(5): 646-661.
  • 6SALEH W, FARRELL S. Implications of congestion char- ging for departure time choice: work and non-work schedule flexibility[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 2005, 39(9): 773-791.
  • 7OZBAY K, YANMAZ-TUZEL O. Valuation of travel time and departure time choice in the presence of time-of-day pri- cing[J]. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Prac- tice, 2008, 42(4) : 577-590.
  • 8BHAT C R. Analysis of travel mode and departure time choice for urban shopping trips[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 1998, 32(6): 361-371.
  • 9DE JONG G, DALY A, PIETERS M, et al. A model for time of day and mode choice using error components logit[J]. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transporta- tion Review, 2003, 39(3): 245-268.
  • 10WEN C H, KOPPELMAN F S. The generalized nested logit model[J]. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 2001, 35(7): 627-671.

共引文献51

同被引文献35

  • 1叶军,刘天宇,王竣德.基于启发式算法的联合投送方案优化[J].军事交通学院学报,2020,22(5):21-27. 被引量:3
  • 2刘宁,杜菲菲,王美丽.联合投送系统效能分析[J].军事交通学院学报,2019,21(10):1-5. 被引量:1
  • 3Chen L, Miller-Hooks E. Resilience : an indicator of recovery ca- pability in intermodal freight transport [ J ]. Transportation Sci- ence,2012,46( 1 ) :109-123.
  • 4Faturechi R, Miller-Hooks E. Measuring the performance of transportation infrastructure systems in disasters: a comprehen-sive review [ J]. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 2015,21 (1) : 1-25.
  • 5Fiksel J. Sustainability and resilience: toward a systems ap- proach [ J ]. Sustainability: Seienee Praetiee and Policy,2006, 2(2) :14-21.
  • 6Ramirez-Marquez J E, Roeeo C M. Towards a unified framework for network resilience [ C ]//Proceedings of the Third Interna- tional Engineering Systems Symposium CESUN,2012:18-20.
  • 7Ip W H, Wang D, Resilience and friability of transportation net- works : evaluation, analysis and optimization [ J ]. Systems Jour- nal, IEEE,2011,5 ( 2 ) , 189-198.
  • 8Zhao K, Kumar A, Harrison T P, et al. Analyzing the resilience of complex supply network topologies against random and tar- geted disruptions [J]. Systems Journal, IEEE,2011,5 ( 1 ): 28-39.
  • 9Miller-Hooks E, Zhang X, Faturechi R. Measuring and maximi- zing resilience of freight transportation networks [ J]. Computers & Operations Research ,2012,39 ( 7 ) : 1633-1643.
  • 10Thadakamaila H P, Raghavan U N, Kumara S, et al. Survivabili- ty of multiagent-based supply networks: a topological perspect [ J]. Intelligent Systems, IEEE, 2004,19 ( 5 ) : 24-31.

引证文献4

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部