期刊文献+

中国古代绩效管理思想研究 被引量:2

Research on Performance Management Thought in Ancient China
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国古代有着丰富的的绩效管理思想。历代帝王重视考绩,有的皇帝亲自抓考绩;专门设立绩效管理机构;主观、定性考核为主,客观、定量为辅;平时考核和任期考核相结合;重视考核结果的使用。通过考核官吏德、才、勤、廉、功而决定职务升迁、收入增减,甚至决定生死。中国古代优秀的绩效管理思想值得学习、借鉴和弘扬。 Ancient China had the abundant performance management thought. Emperors in all dynasties attached great importance to performance appraisal, some of them even conducted that by their own; the performance management organizations were exclusively established the subjective and qualitative appraisal was given the priority while the objective and quantitative was taken as a supplement; the daily evaluation and the tenure evaluation was combined; the utilization of the appraisal resultes were paid significant attention. The promotion, income and even life-and-death of the officials was decided by evaluating their virtue,talent, diligence, integrity and attributions. The outstanding performance management though in the ancient China is worth learning, imitating and carrying forward o
作者 颜世富
出处 《上海管理科学》 2014年第6期83-86,共4页 Shanghai Management Science
关键词 绩效 中国管理学 中国古代管理思想 Performance evaluation China's management ideology management thoughts in ancient China.
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1黄再胜.企业主观业绩评价理论及其发展[J].外国经济与管理,2004,26(8):19-24. 被引量:13
  • 2Baker, George, Robert Gibbons and Kevin J. Murphy. 1994. Subjective Performance Measures in Optimal Incentive Contracts, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109: 1125-56.
  • 3Banker, et al. , 2004, The balanced scorecard : Judgmental effects on performance measures linked to strategies. , The Accounting Review, Vol. 79, No. 1, 1-23.
  • 4Bushman, R M, Indjejikian, R J, and Smit h, A. CEO compensation: t he role of individual performance evaluation, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 1996, 21 : 161 - 193.
  • 5Connor, N. G., Deng, F. J., Shields, M. D., 2006, Determinants of the subjective performance measurement of managerial behavior, working paper.
  • 6Dilla, W. N. , Steinbarl, P. J. , 2005, Relative weighting of common and unique balanced scorecard measures by knowledgeable decision makers, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Vol. 17, 43 -53.
  • 7Fisher, et. al, 2005, An experimental investigation of employer discretion in employee performance evaluation and compensation, The Accounting Review, Vol. 80. No. 2, 563-583.
  • 8Gibbons, Robert. incentives in Organizations Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1998, (12) : 115 -32.
  • 9Gibbs, M, Merchant, K A, van der Stede, W A, and Vargus, 2004 M E. Determinant s and effect s of subjectivity in incentives. The Accounting Review, 79 (2) : 409- 436.
  • 10Gibbons, R., 2005, Incentives between firms (within), Management Science, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2-17.

共引文献13

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部