期刊文献+

逐层特征选择的多层部件模型用于遥感图像飞机目标检测 被引量:5

Multi-layer Feature Selection Based Hierarchal Component Model for Aero-plane Detection on Remote Sensing Image
原文传递
导出
摘要 提出了一种基于逐层特征选择的多层部件模型目标检测算法(multi-layer feature selection based hierarchal component model,MFSHCM),用于遥感图像飞机目标检测。通过提取目标多特征并结合局部判别式模型的建模方法,首先将提取的目标多种特征采用多核学习的方法经过核函数变换后再进行组合,提高了目标描述的准确性;其次考虑到目标自身固有的结构特性,特别是层次结构关系,引入分层的思想,构造目标的分层结构特征,并通过分层特征选择有效地降低了特征计算的复杂度;最后将MKL多特征和分层结构相结合,利用LSVM学习和推理,提出了基于逐层特征选择的多层部件模型目标检测算法。实验中将该算法在收集的十大机场真实场景数据上进行测试,验证了算法的有效性。 In this paper,we propose a multiple feature based hierarchal component model for aeroplane detection on remote sensing image.In order to take the use of multiple features together with Part-based Model approach,we propose the new algorithm:first,in order to give a more clear description of the target,MKL learning method is used to combine the multiple feature extracted from the target through a liner combination procedure,then,because the object itself has structure features,we build a latent hierarchical structure model(LHSM),at last,we combine the MKL and LHS together to form the algorithm proposed in the beginning.We also test the effects of the new algorithm by collecting the remote sensing images from ten international airports;the result shows that the new approach is worthwhile.
出处 《武汉大学学报(信息科学版)》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2014年第12期1406-1411,共6页 Geomatics and Information Science of Wuhan University
基金 国家973计划资助项目(2013CB733404) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(41371342 61331016) 湖北省自然科学基金资助项目(2012FFB04203)~~
关键词 遥感 分层结构(LHS) 多核学习(MKL) 多特征组合 分层特征选择 目标检测 remote sensing latent hierarchical structure multiple kernels learning feature combination hierarchal feature selection object detection
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1I.owe D G. Distinctive Image Features from Scale- invariant Key-points[J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 60(2): 91-110.
  • 2Dalal N ,Triggs B. Histograms of Oriented Gradi- ents for Human Deteetion[C]. IEEE Conf. Com- puter Vision and Pattern Reeognition, San Diego, CA, 2005.
  • 3Dalai N. Finding People in Images and Videos[D]. France: Institut Nat. Polyteehnique de Grenoble, 2006.
  • 4Walk S, Maer N, Sehindler K, et al. New Fea- tures and Insights for Pedestrian Detection [C].IEEE Conf. Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion, San Francisco, USA, 2010.
  • 5Hussain S ,Triggs B. Feature Sets and Dimension- ality Reduction for Visual Object Det[C]. British Machine Vision Conf. , Aberystwyth, Wales, 2010.
  • 6Walk S, Majer N, Schindler K, et al. New Fea- tures Andinsights for Pedestrian Detection [C]. IEEE Conf. Computer Visionand Pattern Recogni- tion, San Francisco, USA, 2010.
  • 7Andrea V,Varun G,Manik V. Multiple Kernels for Object Detection[C]. ICCV, Kyoto, 2009.
  • 8Gehler P, Nowozin S. On Feature Combination for Muhiclass Object Classification[C]. ICCV, Kyoto, 2009.
  • 9Zhu Long(Leo), Chen Yuanhao, Yuille A, et al.Latent Hierarchical Structural Learning for Object Detection[C]. CVPR, San Francisco, USA, 2010.
  • 10Yu C N J, Joachims T. Learning Structural Sys- tems with Latent Variables[C]. International Con- ference on Machine Learning (ICML), Montreal, Canada, 2009.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Papageorgiou C, Poggio T. A Trainable System for Object Detection[J]. Int Journal of Computer Vi- sion, 2000, 38(1): 15-33.
  • 2Lowe D G. Distinctive Image Features from Scale- invariant Key-points[J]. Int Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 60(2): 91-110.
  • 3Dalal N, Triggs B. Histograms of Oriented Gradi- ents for Human Detection[C]. IEEE Conf Comput- er Vision and Pattern Recognition, 1NRIA Rhone- Alps, Montbonnot, France, 2005.
  • 4Felzenswalb P F, Grishick R B, McAllister D, et al. Object Detection with Diseriminatively Trained Part-based Models[J]. PAMI, 2010, 32(9):1 627- 1 645.
  • 5Viola P A, Jones M J, Snow D. Detecting Pedestri- ans Using Patterns of Motion and Appearance[J]. Int Journal of Computer Vision, 2005, 63 (2) : 153- 161.
  • 6Walk S, Majer N, Schindler K, et al. New Fea- tures and Insights for Pedestrian Detection[C].IEEE Conf Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion Tech Llniv Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany, 2010.
  • 7Hussain S, Triggs B. Feature Sets and Dimension- ality Reduction for Visual Object Detection [ C]. British Machine Vision Conf, 2010.
  • 8Dollar P, Wojek C, Schiele B, eta 1. Pedestrian Deetection: an Evaluation of the State of the Art [J]. PAMI, 2011, 34(4):743-761.
  • 9Zhu L, Chen Y, Yuille A, et al. Latent Hierarchi- cal Structural Learning for Object Detection [ C]. IEEE CVPR, Tech Univ Darmstadt, Darmstadt, Germany, 2010.
  • 10Felzenszwalb P F, McAllester D. Object Detection[M]. Grammars, 2010.

共引文献3

同被引文献39

  • 1DALAL N, TRIGGS B. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection [ C l// Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. Washing- ton, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2005, 1:886-893.
  • 2FENSZWALB P F, GIRSHICK R B, MCALLETER D, et al. Ob- ject detection with discriminatively trained part-based models [ J]. IEEE Transaction on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2010, 32(9) : 1627 - 1645.
  • 3LOVE D G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints [J]. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 60(2) : 91 - 110.
  • 4PANDEY M, LAZEBNIK S. Scene cognition and weakly super- vised object localization with deformable part-based models [ C]// Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Computer Vi- sion. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2011: 1307 - 1314.
  • 5AZIZPOUR H, LAPTEV I. Object detection using strongly-super- vised deformable part models [ C]// ECCV 2012: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Computer Vision, LNCS 7572. Berlin: Springer, 2012:836-849.
  • 6MALISIEWICZ T, GUPTA A, EFROS A A. Ensemble of exem- plar-SVMs for object detection and beyond [ C]// Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Computer Vision. Washing- ton, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 2011:89-96.
  • 7PARK D, RAMANAN D, FOWLKES C. Multiresolution models for object detection [ C]// ECCV 2010: Proceedings of the 1 lth European Conference on Computer Vision, LNCS 6314. Berlin: Springer, 2010:241-254.
  • 8LU S X, WANG Z. A comparison among four SVM classification methods: LSVM, NLSVM, SSVM and NSVM [ C]// Proceedings of the 2004 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cy- beroetics. Piscataway, NJ: IEEE, 2004, 7:4277-4282.
  • 9FELZENSZWALB P F, HUTTENLOCHER D P. Distance trans- forms of sampled functions [ J]. Theory of Computing, 2012, 8 (19): 415-428.
  • 10ANDREWS S, TSOCHANTARIDIS I, HOFMANN T. Support vec- tor machines for multiple-instance learning [ C]// Proceedings of the 2002 Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2002:561-568.

引证文献5

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部