期刊文献+

应用Bold螺钉内固定融合手术治疗Dwight Ⅱ型足副舟骨12例临床分析

Clinical analysis of surgical treatment for 12 cases of Dwight type Ⅱ accessory navicular bones with Bold screw internal fixation and fusion
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨应用Bold螺钉内固定融合手术治疗DwightⅡ型足副舟骨的临床效果。方法回顾性分析2010年1月-2012年1月我科应用Bold螺钉手术治疗的12例(18足)DwightⅡ型足副舟骨的病例,术后采用美国足踝外科协会AOFAS评分系统进行疗效评价。结果本组12例均获随访,时间8~20(15.3±4.2)个月,患足疼痛症状消失15足,明显缓解3足,扁平足塌陷减轻5足。结论Bold螺钉手术治疗DwightⅡ型足副舟骨疗效满意,能明显改善疼痛,是一种较好的治疗方式。 Objective To discuss clinical effects of surgical treatment with Bold screw internal fixation and fusion on Dwight type Ⅱ accessory navicular bones. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 12 cases ( 18 feet) of Dwight Type Ⅱ accessory navicular bones that had been treated with Bold screw internal fixation and fusion from Jan 2010 to Jan 2012. All the cases were evaluated by AOFAS scoring system. Results All the 12 cases were followed up for a mean of 15.3 ± 4.2 ( 8 - 20) months. The postoperative pain symptoms disappeared in 15 feet and obviously alleviated in 3 feet, and fiat feet subsidence reduced in 5 feet. Conclusion Bold screw internal fixation plus fusion surgery is of satisfactory effect. It may significantly decrease pain and is a worthy surgical choice for treatment of Dwight Type Ⅱ accessory navicular bones.
出处 《临床军医杂志》 CAS 2014年第12期1249-1251,共3页 Clinical Journal of Medical Officers
基金 辽宁省自然科学基金项目(NO:201202241)
关键词 手术治疗 副舟骨 surgical procedure foot accessory navicular bone
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Leonard GO,Fortin PT.Adolescent accessory navicular[J].Foot Ankle Clin N Am,2010(15):337-347.
  • 2Coughlin MJ.Sesamoids and accessory bones of the foot[A].In:Coughlin MJ,Mann RA,Saltzman CL eds.Surgery of the Foot and Ankle[M].8th ed.Philadelphia:Mosby,2007:531-610.
  • 3刘欣伟,管华鹏,许硕贵,张春才.应用镍钛聚髌器治疗髌骨骨折—成骨力值概念应用于骨折治疗的临床验证[J].中国骨与关节损伤杂志,2009,24(6):536-537. 被引量:14
  • 4SooHoo NF,Shuler M,Fleming LL.Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems by correlation to the SF-36[J].Foot Ankle Int,2003,24(1):50-55.
  • 5Jasiewicz B,Potaczek T,Kachi W,et al.Results of simple excision technique in the surgical treatment of symptomatic accessory navicular bones[J].Foot Ankle Surg,2008,14(2):57-61.
  • 6Garras DM,Hansen PL,Miller AG,et al.Outcome of modified Kidner procedure with subtalar arthroereisis for painful accessory navicular associated with planovalgus deformity[J].Foot Ankle Int,2012,33(11):934-939.
  • 7Chung JW,Chun IT.Outcome of fusion of a painful accessory navicular to the primary navicular[J].Foot Ankle Int,2009,30(2):106-109.
  • 8Nakayama S,Sugimoto K,Takakura Y,et al.Percutaneous drilling of symptomatic accessory navicular in young athletes[J].Am J Sports Med,2005,33(4):531-535.
  • 9Lee J,Youn H,Choi WJ,et al.Comparison of clinical outcome of excision versus osteosynthesis in typeⅡaccessory navicular[J].J Korean Foot Ankle Soc,2011,15(2):72-78.
  • 10Cha SM,Shin HD,Kim KC,et al.Simple excision vs the Kidner procedure for type 2 accessory navicular associated with flatfoot in pediatric population[J].Foot Ankle Int,2013,34(2):167-172.

二级参考文献3

共引文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部