期刊文献+

《采菽堂古诗选》对《文选》的批评与修正

Cai Shu Tang Anthology of Poetry's Criticism and Correction of Wen Xuan
下载PDF
导出
摘要 清初诗论家陈祚明编选《采菽堂古诗选》时参照了昭明《文选》。陈祚明对《文选》的态度是辩证的。一方面,他认为《文选》鉴裁得当,保存了许多经典的古诗;另一方面,他认为也有一些弊端:以文体为类,一人作品割裂为四五处,不利于读者获得完整的诗史观,反而易于使人剽窃华丽词藻,无法获得"学古之益";选诗过严,漏选了很多优秀的作品;着重于修辞,"未及推其(作者)用心所存";《文选》注专注于典故,不关心选家之心。针对这些问题,陈祚明在分类标准、选录原则与情辞关系方面进行了针对性的修正。 As an early Qing critic, Chen Zuoming referred to Wen Xuan when he compiled the Cai Shu Tang Anthology of Poetry.Chen's attitudes towards Wen Xuan were dialectical: on one hand, he admitted that Wen Xuan had preserved a lot of classical poetries;on the other hand, he thought that there were several drawbacks in this book. For example, it used style as classification criteria, so as to disperse works of one author into four or five different places, making it not convenient for readers to understand the history of poetry as a whole, on the contrary, but easy for them to plagiarize beautiful words, thus unable to benefit from ancient poems. What 's more, Wen Xuan's standards of selection was too severe and omitted many good works; It emphasized rhetoric, without caring about the authors' intentions; Its annotations focused on allusions instead of the compiler 's intentions. Therefore, when compiling Cai Shu Tang Anthology of Poetry, Chen took corresponding countermeasures to solve these problems.
作者 张伟
出处 《汕头大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 2014年第6期47-53,96,共7页 Journal of Shantou University(Humanities and Social Sciences Edition)
关键词 《采菽堂古诗选》 《文选》 分类原则 选录标准 情辞关系 非劣即录 Cai Shu Tang Anthology of Poetry Wen Xuan classification principles selection standards the relationship between feelings and rhetoric
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1陈祚明著,李金松点校.采菽堂古诗选[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2008.
  • 2萧统.昭明文选[M].郑州:中州古籍出版社,1990:127.
  • 3宇文所安.他山的石头[M].田晓菲译.南京:江苏人民出版社,2003.
  • 4世界人权宣言[M]//何海波.人权二十讲.天津:天津人民出版社,2008.
  • 5北京师范大学中文系,北京大学中文系文学史教研室.陶渊明资料汇编[M].北京:中华书局,1962.
  • 6孟二冬.孟二冬文存[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2007.

共引文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部