从古书形成过程看诸书“互见”的类型学问题——以《礼记·丧服四制》篇形成为例

Discussions on the Issues Concerning the Typology of Similar Records in Different Books——Take the Forming of Sang Fu Si Zhi Chapter in Book of Rites for Instance

《礼记·丧服四制》篇相较《大戴礼记·本命》《孔子家语·本命解》多出的内容,都当系后人妄增或注文混入。三书中的"丧服四制"节,《礼记》系统大失本貌,糅合进不少晚出的东西。但"丧服四制"节从大戴、《家语》中的尚未独立,到《礼记》系统中自为一篇,亦显示在小戴传习者那里其影响日隆。三书之中的"互见",从"顶层"到"细部",表现为诸多不同的类型,这表明诸书之间的"互见"关系是非常复杂的,因此相应的"类型学"区分尤为必要。

Sang Fu Si Zhi （丧服四制） Piece exists in Book of Rites （礼记） , Da Dai Rites （大戴礼记 ） and Confucius Family Sayings （孔子家语） , while the piece exist in Book of Rites （礼记） has more contents than other books. These more contents of Sang Fu Si Zhi in Book of Rites are not original state, and had been added by latter people. In other words, the Sang Fu Si Zhi piece exists in Da Dai Rites and Confucius Family Sayings are more original than Book of Rites, because the latter are more popular. The similar records in above three books display different types, which show how complicated the phenomenon of Similar Records in Different Books （互见） are , so typology research is necessary.